The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching
- PMID: 25252811
- PMCID: PMC4181411
- DOI: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-40
The effects of participation level on recidivism: a study of drug treatment courts using propensity score matching
Abstract
Background: Empirical evidence has suggested that drug treatment courts (DTCs) reduce re-arrest rates. However, DTC program completion rates are low and little is known about the effectiveness of lower levels of program participation.
Objectives: We examined how DTC program referral, enrollment without completion, and completion, affected re-arrest rates during a two-year follow-up.
Research design: We used statewide North Carolina data from criminal courts merged with DTC data. Propensity score matching was used to select comparison groups based on demographic characteristics, criminal histories, and drug of choice (when available). Average treatment effects on the treated were computed.
Measures: DTC participation levels included referral without enrollment, (n = 2,174), enrollment without completion (n = 954), and completion (n = 747). Recidivism measured as re-arrest on a substance-related charge, on a violent offense charge not involving an allegation of substance abuse, and on any charge (excluding infractions) was examined by felony and misdemeanor status during a two-year follow-up period.
Results: Re-arrest rates were high, 53-76 percent. In general, re-arrest rates were similar for individuals who were referred but who did not enroll and a matched comparison group consisting of individuals who were not referred. In contrast, enrollees who did not complete had lower re-arrest rates than a matched group of individuals who were referred but did not enroll, for arrests on any charge, on any felony charge, and on substance-related charges (felonies and misdemeanors). Finally, relative to persons who enrolled but did not complete, those who completed had lower re-arrest rates on any charge, any felony charge, any misdemeanor charge, any substance-related charge, any substance-related misdemeanor or felony charge, and any violent felony charge.
Conclusions: Enrolling in a DTC, even without completing, reduced re-arrest rates. Given the generally low DTC completion rate, this finding implies that only examining effects of completion underestimates the benefits of DTC programs.
Similar articles
-
Intergenerational effects of parental substance-related convictions and adult drug treatment court participation on children's school performance.Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Sep;85(5):452-68. doi: 10.1037/ort0000087. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015. PMID: 26460705 Free PMC article.
-
Parental Criminal Justice Involvement and Children's Involvement With Child Protective Services: Do Adult Drug Treatment Courts Prevent Child Maltreatment?Subst Use Misuse. 2016;51(2):179-92. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1089906. Epub 2016 Jan 20. Subst Use Misuse. 2016. PMID: 26789656 Free PMC article.
-
Cohort Study of Downgraded Misdemeanor Convictions and Subsequent Violent Crime: Differences by Defendant Race and Ethnicity.AJPM Focus. 2024 Feb 11;3(3):100206. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100206. eCollection 2024 Jun. AJPM Focus. 2024. PMID: 38560401 Free PMC article.
-
Juvenile drug courts: emerging outcomes and key research issues.Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 May;20(3):242-6. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3280ebb601. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007. PMID: 17415076 Review.
-
Reporting of substance use treatment quality in United States adult drug courts.Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Apr;90:103050. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103050. Epub 2020 Dec 11. Int J Drug Policy. 2021. PMID: 33310636 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Identifying and Addressing the Unmet Health Care Needs of Drug Court Clients.J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Dec;71:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.08.017. Epub 2016 Aug 28. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016. PMID: 27776674 Free PMC article.
-
Intergenerational effects of parental substance-related convictions and adult drug treatment court participation on children's school performance.Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015 Sep;85(5):452-68. doi: 10.1037/ort0000087. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2015. PMID: 26460705 Free PMC article.
-
Parental Criminal Justice Involvement and Children's Involvement With Child Protective Services: Do Adult Drug Treatment Courts Prevent Child Maltreatment?Subst Use Misuse. 2016;51(2):179-92. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2015.1089906. Epub 2016 Jan 20. Subst Use Misuse. 2016. PMID: 26789656 Free PMC article.
-
Criminally Involved Parents Who Misuse Substances and Children's Odds of Being Arrested as a Young Adult: Do Drug Treatment Courts Mitigate the Risk?J Child Fam Stud. 2016 Aug;25(8):2447-2457. doi: 10.1007/s10826-016-0406-9. Epub 2016 Apr 11. J Child Fam Stud. 2016. PMID: 27840567 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond recidivism: changes in health and social service involvement following exposure to drug treatment court.Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015 Oct 31;10:42. doi: 10.1186/s13011-015-0038-x. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015. PMID: 26520393 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mumola CJ, Karberg JC. Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2006. pp. 1–12.
-
- How many drug courts are there? Drug courts today [ http://www.ndcrc.org/node/348]
-
- Shaffer DK. Looking inside the black box of drug courts: a meta‒analytic review. Justice Q. 2011;28:493–521. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2010.525222. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical