Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Single and Paired Flash Visual Evoked Potentials
- PMID: 25253432
- DOI: 10.1177/1550059414539481
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Single and Paired Flash Visual Evoked Potentials
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the occipital cortex has a controversial effect on the visual cortex excitability. Paired flash visual evoked potentials (paired F-VEPs) offer a unique method to express neural inhibition within the visual system. However, no studies have explored the effects of tDCS on F-VEPs in humans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes of single- and paired-F-VEPs during and after tDCS in healthy humans. Twenty-six healthy volunteers participated. F-VEPs were recorded from occipital electrodes with closed eyes. Stimuli were single flashes, intermingled to flash pairs at the interstimulus interval of 125, 62.5, 50, 33.3, 16.6, and 11.1 ms (internal frequency of 8, 16, 20, 30, 60, and 90 Hz). The single F-VEP was split into a "main complex" and a "late response." As to paired stimuli, the "test" F-VEP emerged from electronic subtraction of the single-F-VEP to the paired-F-VEP. In experiment 1, the return electrode was located on the scalp and we studied changes in F-VEPs after anodal, cathodal (1 mA, 15 min) and sham stimulation. A second experiment was performed in which F-VEPs were recorded before, during and after tDCS stimulation (anodal and cathodal) with the return electrode on the neck. F-VEPs recorded in experiment 1 did not detect any significant change after tDCS. In experiment 2 anodal polarization significantly increased the P2 latency (P = .031) and reduced the amplitude of the "late response" of the single F-VEP (P = .008). As for the paired F-VEPs, no significant changes were detected. In conclusion, low-intensity anodal tDCS has weak inhibitory aftereffects on the single F-VEP and no effects on the paired F-VEPs. Further methodological studies are needed to improve polarization efficacy.
Keywords: evoked potentials; flash visual evoked potentials; paired stimulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; visual cortex.
© EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society (ECNS) 2014.
Similar articles
-
Impaired visual inhibition in migraine with aura.Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Oct;126(10):1988-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.12.013. Epub 2014 Dec 30. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015. PMID: 25586129
-
Defective visual inhibition in photosensitive idiopathic generalized epilepsy.Epilepsia. 2012 Apr;53(4):695-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03411.x. Epub 2012 Feb 14. Epilepsia. 2012. PMID: 22332790
-
Visual evoked potentials modulation during direct current cortical polarization.Exp Brain Res. 2007 Apr;178(2):261-6. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0733-y. Epub 2006 Oct 19. Exp Brain Res. 2007. PMID: 17051377
-
Visually evoked potentials.Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;160:501-522. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00034-5. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019. PMID: 31277872 Review.
-
Multi-channel pattern VEPs with full and half field stimulation: methods of interpretation and diagnostic evaluation.Doc Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr;150(2):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s10633-025-10012-7. Epub 2025 Mar 25. Doc Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40128423 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on contrast sensitivity and visual evoked potential amplitude in adults with amblyopia.Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 14;6:19280. doi: 10.1038/srep19280. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 26763954 Free PMC article.
-
Low-intensity repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation requires concurrent visual system activity to modulate visual evoked potentials in adult mice.Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 11;8(1):5792. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23979-y. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29643395 Free PMC article.
-
Visual cortex cTBS increases mixed percept duration while a-tDCS has no effect on binocular rivalry.PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0239349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239349. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33539443 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives on the Combined Use of Electric Brain Stimulation and Perceptual Learning in Vision.Vision (Basel). 2022 Jun 14;6(2):33. doi: 10.3390/vision6020033. Vision (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35737420 Free PMC article.
-
Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates offline visual oscillatory activity: A magnetoencephalography study.Cortex. 2017 Mar;88:19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Dec 7. Cortex. 2017. PMID: 28042984 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials