Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Apr;37(2):275-8.
doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000133.

Evaluation of QMS everolimus assay using Indiko analyzer: comparison with an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of QMS everolimus assay using Indiko analyzer: comparison with an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method

Delphine Buthiau et al. Ther Drug Monit. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: A new particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay, Quantitative Microsphere System (QMS) everolimus, was evaluated using an Indiko analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Methods: Analytical performances (imprecision, linearity, limit of detection, and limit of quantification) of this new immunoassay were evaluated. The method was compared with an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC/MS/MS) method and with the previously available Innofluor Certican immunoassay on 120 whole-blood samples from 74 transplant recipients. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plot were used for method comparisons.

Results: Within- and between-day coefficients of variation were <10% at mean levels of 4.3, 8.2, and 15.9 ng/mL, respectively. This assay could be used at everolimus concentrations between 1.7 and 20 ng/mL. We obtained a Passing-Bablok regression of y = 0.99 × -0.15 (r = 0.95) when comparing with the UPLC/MS/MS method and of y = 0.81 × -0.09 (r = 0.94) when comparing with Innofluor assay. The mean and limits of agreement (mean ± 1.96 SD) of the difference between QMS everolimus and UPLC/MS/MS were -0.13 (from -2.0 to 1.74) ng/mL and were -1.19 (from -3.39 to 1.01) ng/mL between QMS everolimus and Innofluor.

Conclusions: The QMS everolimus method on Indiko analyzer demonstrated reliable and reproducible performances allowing routine monitoring in transplant patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources