Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Nov;102(5):1223-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1244. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project: II. Clinical and covariate phenotype data collection in endometriosis research

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonization Project: II. Clinical and covariate phenotype data collection in endometriosis research

Allison F Vitonis et al. Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To harmonize the collection of nonsurgical clinical and epidemiologic data relevant to endometriosis research, allowing large-scale collaboration.

Design: An international collaboration involving 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators from 16 countries on five continents.

Setting: In 2013, two workshops followed by global consultation, bringing together 54 leaders in endometriosis research.

Patients: None.

Intervention(s): Development of a self-administered endometriosis patient questionnaire (EPQ), based on [1] systematic comparison of questionnaires from eight centers that collect data from endometriosis cases (and controls/comparison women) on a medium to large scale (publication on >100 cases); [2] literature evidence; and [3] several global consultation rounds.

Main outcome measure(s): Standard recommended and minimum required questionnaires to capture detailed clinical and covariate data.

Result(s): The standard recommended (EPHect EPQ-S) and minimum required (EPHect EPQ-M) questionnaires contain questions on pelvic pain, subfertility and menstrual/reproductive history, hormone/medication use, medical history, and personal information.

Conclusion(s): The EPQ captures the basic set of patient characteristics and exposures considered by the WERF EPHect Working Group to be most critical for the advancement of endometriosis research, but is also relevant to other female conditions with similar risk factors and/or symptomatology. The instruments will be reviewed based on feedback from investigators, and-after a first review after 1 year-triannually through systematic follow-up surveys. Updated versions will be made available through http://endometriosisfoundation.org/ephect.

Keywords: EPHect EPQ; Endometriosis; pelvic pain; questionnaire; standardization; symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram depicting the WERF EPHect development and consensus process (clinical data collection).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mechanisms by which the nervous system can be engaged in endometriosis (17). Endometriotic lesions appear to be able to engage the nervous system throughout the neuroaxis. In addition to developing their own innervation [both peptidergic sensory (blue) and sympathetic nerve fibers (green)], all nerve fibers within the pelvis may become sensitized (red asterisk), as may the central nervous system. The extent of peripheral sensitization is dynamically modulated by estradiol and sympathetic-sensory coupling, and other factors may modulate central sensitization.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Factors influencing nociceptive inputs to affect pain perception (18). A variety of factors modulate incoming signals such that the experience of pain is not linearly related to the nociceptive input.

References

    1. Becker CM, Laufer MR, Stratton P, Hummelshoj L, Missmer SA, Zondervan KT, et al. World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project: I. Surgical phenotype data collection in endometriosis research. Fertil Steril. 2014;102 XXX-XX. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rogers PA, D’Hooghe TM, Fazleabas A, Giudice LC, Montgomery GW, Petraglia F, et al. Defining future directions for endometriosis research: workshop report from the 2011 World Congress of Endometriosis in Mont-pellier, France. Reprod Sci. 2013;20:483–499. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson A. Thinking big: large-scale collaborative research in observational epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24:727–731. - PubMed
    1. Fortier I, Doiron D, Little J, Ferretti V, L'Heureux F, Stolk RP, et al. Is rigorous retrospective harmonization possible? Application of the DataSHaPER approach across 53 large studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:1314–1328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blein S, Berndt S, Joshi AD, Campa D, Ziegler RG, Riboli E, et al. Factors associated with oxidative stress and cancer risk in the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium. Free Radic Res. 2014;48:380–386. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types