Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 26:14:205.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-205.

Assessment of faculty productivity in academic departments of medicine in the United States: a national survey

Victor F Kairouz, Dany Raad, John Fudyma, Anne B Curtis, Holger J Schünemann, Elie A Akl  1
Affiliations

Assessment of faculty productivity in academic departments of medicine in the United States: a national survey

Victor F Kairouz et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Faculty productivity is essential for academic medical centers striving to achieve excellence and national recognition. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether and how academic Departments of Medicine in the United States measure faculty productivity for the purpose of salary compensation.

Methods: We surveyed the Chairs of academic Departments of Medicine in the United States in 2012. We sent a paper-based questionnaire along with a personalized invitation letter by postal mail. For non-responders, we sent reminder letters, then called them and faxed them the questionnaire. The questionnaire included 8 questions with 23 tabulated close-ended items about the types of productivity measured (clinical, research, teaching, administrative) and the measurement strategies used. We conducted descriptive analyses.

Results: Chairs of 78 of 152 eligible departments responded to the survey (51% response rate). Overall, 82% of respondents reported measuring at least one type of faculty productivity for the purpose of salary compensation. Amongst those measuring faculty productivity, types measured were: clinical (98%), research (61%), teaching (62%), and administrative (64%). Percentages of respondents who reported the use of standardized measurements units (e.g., Relative Value Units (RVUs)) varied from 17% for administrative productivity to 95% for research productivity. Departments reported a wide variation of what exact activities are measured and how they are monetarily compensated. Most compensation plans take into account academic rank (77%). The majority of compensation plans are in the form of a bonus on top of a fixed salary (66%) and/or an adjustment of salary based on previous period productivity (55%).

Conclusion: Our survey suggests that most academic Departments of Medicine in the United States measure faculty productivity and convert it into standardized units for the purpose of salary compensation. The exact activities that are measured and how they are monetarily compensated varied substantially across departments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of departments by the combination of the different types of productivity measured simultaneously.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Levine AS, Detre TP, McDonald MC, Roth LH, Huber GA, Brignano MG, Danoff SN, Farner DM, Masnick JL, Romoff JA. The relationship between the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-a profile in synergy. Acad Med. 2008;83(9):816–826. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181d1a8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wartman SA. Toward a virtuous cycle: the changing face of academic health centers. Acad Med. 2008;83(9):797–799. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318181cf8c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akl EA, Meerpohl JJ, Raad D, Piaggio G, Mattioni M, Paggi MG, Gurtner A, Mattarocci S, Tahir R, Muti P, Schünemann HJ. Effects of assessing the productivity of faculty in academic medical centres: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2012;184(11):E602–612. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111123. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garson A, Jr, Strifert KE, Beck JR, Schulmeier GA, Patrick JW, Buffone GJ, Feigin RD. The metrics process: Baylor's development of a "report card" for faculty and departments. Acad Med. 1999;74(8):861–870. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199908000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santilli SM. Current issues facing academic surgery departments: stakeholders' views. Acad Med. 2008;83(1):66–73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31815c6570. - DOI - PubMed
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/14/205/prepub

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources