Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;31(3):322-345.
doi: 10.1177/0894439312469865.

The Design of Grids in Web Surveys

Affiliations

The Design of Grids in Web Surveys

Mick P Couper et al. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Grid or matrix questions are associated with a number of problems in Web surveys. In this paper, we present results from two experiments testing the design of grid questions to reduce breakoffs, missing data, and satisficing. The first examines dynamic elements to help guide respondent through the grid, and on splitting a larger grid into component pieces. The second manipulates the visual complexity of the grid and on simplifying the grid. We find that using dynamic feedback to guide respondents through a multi-question grid helps reduce missing data. Splitting the grids into component questions further reduces missing data and motivated underreporting. The visual complexity of the grid appeared to have little effect on performance.

Keywords: Web surveys; grid questions; measurement error; satisficing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Portion of the Baseline Grid, Experiment 1

References

    1. Bell DS, Mangione CM, Kahn CE. Randomized Testing of Alternative Survey Formats Using Anonymous Volunteers on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2001;8(6):616–620. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callegaro M, Shand-Lubbers J, Dennis JM. Presentation of a Single Item Versus a Grid: Effects on the Vitality and Mental Health Subscales of the SF-36v2 Health survey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research; Hollywood, FL. May.2009.
    1. Callegaro M, Villar A, Yang Y. A Meta-Analysis of Experiments Manipulating Progress Indicators in Web Surveys. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research; Phoenix. May.2011.
    1. Chang L, Krosnick JA. Comparing Oral Interviews with Self-Administered Computerized Questionnaires: An Experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2010;74(1):154–167.
    1. Conrad FG, Couper MP, Tourangeau R, Peytchev A. The Impact of Progress Indicators on Task Completion. Interacting with Computers. 2010;22(5):417–427. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources