Comparison of process parameter optimization using different designs in nanoemulsion-based formulation for transdermal delivery of fullerene

Abstract

This research aims to formulate and to optimize a nanoemulsion-based formulation containing fullerene, an antioxidant, stabilized by a low amount of mixed surfactants using high shear and the ultrasonic emulsification method for transdermal delivery. Process parameters optimization of fullerene nanoemulsions was done by employing response surface methodology, which involved statistical multivariate analysis. Optimization of independent variables was investigated using experimental design based on Box-Behnken design and central composite rotatable design. An investigation on the effect of the homogenization rate (4,000-5,000 rpm), sonication amplitude (20%-60%), and sonication time (30-150 seconds) on the particle size, ζ-potential, and viscosity of the colloidal systems was conducted. Under the optimum conditions, the central composite rotatable design model suggested the response variables for particle size, ζ-potential, and viscosity of the fullerene nanoemulsion were 152.5 nm, -52.6 mV, and 44.6 pascal seconds, respectively. In contrast, the Box-Behnken design model proposed that preparation under the optimum condition would produce nanoemulsion with particle size, ζ-potential, and viscosity of 148.5 nm, -55.2 mV, and 39.9 pascal seconds, respectively. The suggested process parameters to obtain optimum formulation by both models yielded actual response values similar to the predicted values with residual standard error of <2%. The optimum formulation showed more elastic and solid-like characteristics due to the existence of a large linear viscoelastic region.

Keywords: Box–Behnken design; central composite rotatable design; fullerene; nanoemulsion; palm kernel oil ester; response surface methodology.

Figure 1

Response surface plot (CCRD) showing effects of (a) homogenization rate, (b) sonication amplitude, and (c) sonication time on (A) particle size, (B) zeta potential, and (C) viscosity. Abbreviation: CCRD, central composite rotatable design.

Figure 2

Response surface plot (BBD) showing effects of (a) homogenization rate, (b) sonication amplitude, and (c) sonication time on (A) particle size, (B) zeta potential, and (C) viscosity. Abbreviation: BBD, Box–Behnken design.

Figure 3

Storage modulus (G′), loss modulus (G″), and phase angle (δ) as a function of strain amplitude γ of the optimum fullerene nanoemulsion.