Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014:2014:475659.
doi: 10.1155/2014/475659. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

A comparison study of portable foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance scale to measure body fat percentage in Asian adults and children

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison study of portable foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance scale to measure body fat percentage in Asian adults and children

Pei Ying Sim et al. Biomed Res Int. 2014.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the measurements of body fat percentage (BF%) using the foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis (FTF-BIA) with the direct segmental multifrequency BIA (DSM-BIA).

Methods: There were 36 men and 52 women (37.1 ± 14.3 years) with 57% Malays, 30% Chinese, and 13% Indian. For children, there were 45 boys and 26 girls (11.5 ± 2.5 years) with 52% Malay, 15% Chinese, and 33% Indian.

Results: Mean height for men was 168.4 cm, 11 cm taller than women. Men were 10 kg heavier than women at 70 kg. BF% in women was 32% and 33% whereas BF% in men was 23% and 25% when measured using FTF-BIA and DSM-BIA, respectively. In children, BF% measured with FTF-BIA and DSM-BIA was 49% and 46%, respectively. The correlations were significant for men (r = 0.92, SEE = 2.80), women (r = 0.91, SEE = 3.31), boys (r = 0.95, SEE = 5.44), and girls (r = 0.96, SEE = 5.27). The BF% in underweight/normal (r = 0.92, SEE = 2.47) and that in overweight/obese adults (r = 0.89, SEE = 3.61) were strongly correlated. The correlations were significant in normal/underweight (r = 0.94, SEE = 3.78) and obese/overweight children (r = 0.83, SEE = 6.49). All ethnic groups showed significant correlation with BF%. Malay adults (r = 0.92, SEE = 3.27) and children (r = 0.94, SEE = 0.88) showed significant mean differences in BF%.

Conclusion: The FTF-BIA showed higher accuracy for all normal/underweight and Chinese group with acceptable overestimation in children and underestimation in adults. Caution should be taken when interpreting BF% depending on gender, BMI, and ethnicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bland-Altman plots of body fat percentage (BF%) in foot-to-foot BIA and direct segmental multifrequency BIA in adults ((a) men; (b) women) and children ((c) boys; (d) girls) by gender and in BMI groups adults ((e) normal/underweight; (f) obese/overweight) and children ((g) normal/underweight; (h) obese/overweight) and by ethnicity in adults ((i) Malay; (j) Chinese; (k) Indian) and children ((l) Malay; (m) Chinese; (n) Indian).

References

    1. Dehghan M, Merchant AT. Is bioelectrical impedance accurate for use in large epidemiological studies? Nutrition Journal. 2008;7(1, article 26) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sun G, French CR, Martin GR, et al. Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of percentage body fat in a large, healthy population. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2005;81(1):74–78. - PubMed
    1. Barreira TV, Staiano AE, Katzmarzyk PT. Validity assessment of a portable bioimpedance scale to estimate body fat percentage in White and African-American children and adolescents. Pediatric Obesity. 2013;8(2):E29–E32. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung RYT, Lau P, Yu CW, Lam PKW, Nelson EAS. Measurement of body fat using leg to leg bioimpedance. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2001;85(3):263–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karelis AD, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Duval C, Chamberland G. Validation of a portable bioelectrical impedance analyzer for the assessment of body composition. Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism. 2013;38(1):27–32. - PubMed

Publication types