Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e108636.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108636. eCollection 2014.

Do gravity-related sensory information enable the enhancement of cortical proprioceptive inputs when planning a step in microgravity?

Affiliations

Do gravity-related sensory information enable the enhancement of cortical proprioceptive inputs when planning a step in microgravity?

Anahid H Saradjian et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

We recently found that the cortical response to proprioceptive stimulation was greater when participants were planning a step than when they stood still, and that this sensory facilitation was suppressed in microgravity. The aim of the present study was to test whether the absence of gravity-related sensory afferents during movement planning in microgravity prevented the proprioceptive cortical processing to be enhanced. We reestablished a reference frame in microgravity by providing and translating a horizontal support on which the participants were standing and verified whether this procedure restored the proprioceptive facilitation. The slight translation of the base of support (lateral direction), which occurred prior to step initiation, stimulated at least cutaneous and vestibular receptors. The sensitivity to proprioceptive stimulation was assessed by measuring the amplitude of the cortical somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP, over the Cz electrode) following the vibration of the leg muscle. The vibration lasted 1 s and the participants were asked to either initiate a step at the vibration offset or to remain still. We found that the early SEP (90-160 ms) was smaller when the platform was translated than when it remained stationary, revealing the existence of an interference phenomenon (i.e., when proprioceptive stimulation is preceded by the stimulation of different sensory modalities evoked by the platform translation). By contrast, the late SEP (550 ms post proprioceptive stimulation onset) was greater when the translation preceded the vibration compared to a condition without pre-stimulation (i.e., no translation). This suggests that restoring a body reference system which is impaired in microgravity allowed a greater proprioceptive cortical processing. Importantly, however, the late SEP was similarly increased when participants either produced a step or remained still. We propose that the absence of step-induced facilitation of proprioceptive cortical processing results from a decreased weight of proprioception in the absence of balance constraints in microgravity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental set-up and mean lateral platform acceleration (left scale and red curve) and head acceleration (right scale and black curve) during Translation standing condition for the 6 participants.
The onset and offset of head acceleration and deceleration, respectively, were indicated by the arrows according to the vestibular threshold (horizontal dotted lines). B: Mean platform and head accelerations for each of the 6 participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2. SEPs recordings. Grand-Average for 6 participants recorded at electrode Cz for the Stationnary standing condition (Top panel), Translation standing and Translation stepping conditions (Bottom panel).
The vertical dotted lines indicate the vibration onset and offset, the second vertical dotted line also indicates imperative tone stimulus for step execution. For both Translation conditions, the vertical dash-dotted line indicates the translation onset (occurring 500 ms before vibration). The “foot-off” indicates the onset of the stepping movement computed on the foot vertical velocity. The scalp topography was shown at the peak negativity for the participants average in the Sationary and Translation conditions.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mean P1-N1 SEP amplitude of each participant (P1–P6) for the Stationary and Translation platform conditions (upper panel).
Normalized attenuation for the translation condition relative to the Stationary condition (bottom panel). The mean attenuation for the 6 participants was of 21% (±6). B: Mean amplitudes for 6 participants of the P1-N1 early SEP and mean integral of EEG activity (iEEG, late SEP) computed in a time window comprising between early SEP ending until 600 ms (*: p<0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Results of source reconstruction from the grand average EEG data of the 6 participants (Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography, sLORETA) displayed on the used source space (Montreal warp brain aligned to the co-ordinate system of Talairach and Tournaux).
sLORETA images depicted the estimated current density strengh corresponding to the effect of translation relative to baseline (Translation minus Stationary) for the Late SEP. The scale of the maps was chosen to maximize identification of the sources and were given a marked threshold to only show source activity that was 18% upper of minimal activation. Note the clearly distinguishable activation above the primary somatosensory cortice (top view) and the right posterior parietal cortex (e.g., VIP) and the Temporoparietal region.

References

    1. Asanuma K, Urushihara R, Nakamura K, Kitaoka K, Sei H, et al. (2003) Premovement gating of somatosensory evoked potentials after tibial nerve stimulation. Neuroreport 14: 375–379. - PubMed
    1. Wasaka T, Kida T, Kakigi R (2012) Modulation of somatosensory evoked potentials during force generation and relaxation. Exp Brain Res 219: 227–33. - PubMed
    1. Shimazu H, Kaji R, Murase N, Kohara N, Ikeda A, et al. (1999) Premovement gating of somatosensory evoked potentials after tibial nerve stimulation. Neuroreport 10: 2457–60. - PubMed
    1. Cheron G, Borenstein S (1987) Specific gating of the early somatosensory evoked potentials during active movement. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 67: 537–548. - PubMed
    1. Starr A, Cohen LG (1985) Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials begins before the onset of voluntary movement in man. Brain research 348: 183–186. - PubMed

Publication types