Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting
- PMID: 25260047
- DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0069
Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the accuracy of Contour(®) Next (CN; Bayer HealthCare LLC, Diabetes Care, Whippany, NJ) compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems (BGMSs) across a wide range of clinically occurring blood glucose levels.
Subjects and methods: Subjects (n=146) were ≥ 18 years and had type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Subjects' glucose levels were safely lowered or raised to provide a wide range of glucose values. Capillary blood samples were tested on six BGMSs and a YSI glucose analyzer (YSI Life Sciences, Inc., Yellow Springs, OH) as the reference. Extreme glucose values were achieved by glucose modification of the blood sample. System accuracy was assessed by mean absolute difference (MAD) and mean absolute relative difference (MARD) across several glucose ranges, with <70 mg/dL evaluated by MAD as the primary end point.
Results: In the low glucose range (<70 mg/dL), MAD values were as follows: Accu-Chek(®) Aviva Nano (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), 3.34 mg/dL; CN, 2.03 mg/dL; FreeStyle Lite(®) (FSL; Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc., Alameda, CA), 2.77 mg/dL; OneTouch(®) Ultra(®) 2 (LifeScan, Inc., Milpitas, CA), 10.20 mg/dL; OneTouch(®) Verio(®) Pro (LifeScan, Inc.), 4.53 mg/dL; and Truetrack(®) (Nipro Diagnostics, Inc., Fort Lauderdale, FL), 11.08 mg/dL. The lowest MAD in the low glucose range, from CN, was statistically significantly lower than those of the other BGMSs with the exception of the FSL. CN also had a statistically significantly lower MARD than all other BGMSs in the low glucose range. In the overall glucose range (21-496 mg/dL), CN yielded the lowest MAD and MARD values, which were statistically significantly lower in comparison with the other BGMSs.
Conclusions: When compared with other BGMSs, CN demonstrated the lowest mean deviation from the reference value (by MAD and MARD) across multiple glucose ranges.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Apr;14(4):330-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0170. Epub 2011 Dec 16. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012. PMID: 22176154 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Accuracy Evaluation of CONTOUR(®)PLUS Compared With Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.Diabetes Ther. 2015 Sep;6(3):377-88. doi: 10.1007/s13300-015-0121-3. Epub 2015 Jul 14. Diabetes Ther. 2015. PMID: 26169192 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Apr;28(4):525-31. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.673479. Epub 2012 Mar 21. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012. PMID: 22435798 Clinical Trial.
-
Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 1;7(5):1294-304. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700520. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013. PMID: 24124957 Free PMC article.
-
Frequency characterization of blood glucose dynamics.Ann Biomed Eng. 2003 Jan;31(1):91-7. doi: 10.1114/1.1535411. Ann Biomed Eng. 2003. PMID: 12572659 Review.
Cited by
-
The Rectangle Target Plot: A New Approach to the Graphical Presentation of Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 9;10(2):343-9. doi: 10.1177/1932296815612490. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015. PMID: 26452634 Free PMC article.
-
The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Nov;17(11):787-94. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0378. Epub 2015 Jul 14. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015. PMID: 26171659 Free PMC article.
-
Testing the Real-World Accuracy of the Dexcom G6 Pro CGM During the Insulin-Only Bionic Pancreas Pivotal Trial.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Nov;25(11):817-821. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0287. Epub 2023 Oct 3. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023. PMID: 37668666 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Perspective on Its Past, Present, and Future Applications for Diabetes Management.Clin Diabetes. 2017 Jan;35(1):60-65. doi: 10.2337/cd16-0008. Clin Diabetes. 2017. PMID: 28144048 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jul;9(4):885-94. doi: 10.1177/1932296815580160. Epub 2015 Apr 14. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015. PMID: 25872965 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical