Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;4(3):314-23.
doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0256-1.

Obesity in social media: a mixed methods analysis

Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou  1 , Abby Prestin  2 , Stephen Kunath  3
Affiliations

Obesity in social media: a mixed methods analysis

Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou et al. Transl Behav Med. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

The escalating obesity rate in the USA has made obesity prevention a top public health priority. Recent interventions have tapped into the social media (SM) landscape. To leverage SM in obesity prevention, we must understand user-generated discourse surrounding the topic. This study was conducted to describe SM interactions about weight through a mixed methods analysis. Data were collected across 60 days through SM monitoring services, yielding 2.2 million posts. Data were cleaned and coded through Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, yielding popular themes and the most retweeted content. Qualitative analyses of selected posts add insight into the nature of the public dialogue and motivations for participation. Twitter represented the most common channel. Twitter and Facebook were dominated by derogatory and misogynist sentiment, pointing to weight stigmatization, whereas blogs and forums contained more nuanced comments. Other themes included humor, education, and positive sentiment countering weight-based stereotypes. This study documented weight-related attitudes and perceptions. This knowledge will inform public health/obesity prevention practice.

Keywords: Cyber aggression; Health communication; Mixed methods; Obesity; Online social support; Social media; Weight stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ata RN, Thompson JK. Weight bias in the media: a review of recent research. Obes Facts. 2010;3:41–46. doi: 10.1159/000276547. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chou WY, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e48. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1249. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chou WS, Prestin A, Lyons C, Wen K. Web 2.0 for health promotion: reviewing the current evidence. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(1):e9–e18. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301071. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christopherson KM. The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog. Computers and Human Behavior. 2007;23(6):3038–3056. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.09.001. - DOI
    1. Dickins M, Thomas SL, King B, Lewis S, Holland K. The role of the fatosphere in fat adults’ responses to obesity stigma: a model of empowerment without a focus on weight loss. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(12):1679–1691. doi: 10.1177/1049732311417728. - DOI - PubMed