Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep:1325:242-68.
doi: 10.1111/nyas.12533.

Surgical treatments for esophageal cancers

Affiliations

Surgical treatments for esophageal cancers

William H Allum et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

The following, from the 12th OESO World Conference: Cancers of the Esophagus, includes commentaries on the role of the nurse in preparation of esophageal resection (ER); the management of patients who develop high-grade dysplasia after having undergone Nissen fundoplication; the trajectory of care for the patient with esophageal cancer; the influence of the site of tumor in the choice of treatment; the best location for esophagogastrostomy; management of chylous leak after esophagectomy; the optimal approach to manage thoracic esophageal leak after esophagectomy; the choice for operational approach in surgery of cardioesophageal crossing; the advantages of robot esophagectomy; the place of open esophagectomy; the advantages of esophagectomy compared to definitive chemoradiotherapy; the pathologist report in the resected specimen; the best way to manage patients with unsuspected positive microscopic margin after ER; enhanced recovery after surgery for ER: expedited care protocols; and long-term quality of life in patients following esophagectomy.

Keywords: Nissen fundoplication; OESO; chemoradiotherapy; esophageal resection; esophagectomy; esophagogastrostomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Surgical algorithm for esophageal cancers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Postoperative nutritional strategy of avoiding early oral feeding.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Endoscopic control of anastomosis (indicated by the arrow) during the operation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Contrasting imagining of the anastomosis. The anastomosis is indicated by the arrow.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Patient A: proximal cervical esophageal margin (inked blue) with tumor foci present within the muscle wall. (B) Patient B: mucinous signet ring adenocarcinoma consisting of mucin pools with scattered rare viable carcinoma cells involving the distal stomach resection margin.

References

    1. Takubo K, Aida J, Naomoto Y, et al. Cardiac rather than intestinal-type background in endoscopic resection specimens of minute Barrett adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2009;40:65–74. - PubMed
    1. Orringer MB, Sloan H. Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1978;76:643–654. - PubMed
    1. Camilo Barreto J, Posner MC. Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;18:3804–3810. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ovrebo KK, Lie SA, Laerum OD, et al. Long term survival from adenocarcinoma of the esophagus after transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:130–140. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Logue B, Griffin S. Road Map to esophagectomy for nurses. Crit Care Nurse. 2011;31:69–86. - PubMed

Publication types