Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Dec;31(12):1621-7.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0346-5. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

Cumulative live birth rate after two single frozen embryo transfers (eSFET) versus a double frozen embryo transfer (DFET) with cleavage stage embryos: a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cumulative live birth rate after two single frozen embryo transfers (eSFET) versus a double frozen embryo transfer (DFET) with cleavage stage embryos: a retrospective cohort study

Ma Luisa López Regalado et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: According to the latest ART report for Europe, about 13% of pregnancies after frozen embryo transfer are multiple. Our objective was to analyse the impact on the multiple pregnancy rate of two eSFET (elective single frozen embryo transfers) versus a DFET (double frozen embryo transfer) in women aged under 38 years, who had not achieved pregnancy in their fresh transfer and who had at least two vitrified embryos of A/B quality.

Methods: This study was conducted from January 2010 to June 2013 at a public hospital. The couples were divided into three groups. Group DFET: the first cryotransfer of two embryos (105 women); cSFET group: the only cryotransfer of a single vitrified embryo (60 women); eSFET group, individually vitrified embryos: 20 patients included in a clinical trial of single-embryo fresh and frozen transfer and 21 patients who chose to receive eSFET.

Results: The clinical pregnancy rate was 38.1% in the DET group and the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate was 43.3% in the eSFET group. There were no significant differences between the DFET and eSFET groups (30.0 vs 34.1%) in cumulative live birth delivery rate. The rate of multiple pregnancies varied significantly between the DFET and eSFET groups (32.5 vs 0%, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: For good-prognosis women aged under 38 years, taking embryo quality as a criterion for inclusion, an eSFET policy can be applied, achieving acceptable cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates and reducing multiple pregnancy rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of participants in the study

References

    1. Cobo A, Santos MJ D l, Castellò D, Gámiz P, Campos P, Remohí J. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1138–46. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1107. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu SY, Teng B, Fu J, Li X, Zheng Y, Sun XX. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after transfer of vitrified early cleavage embryos. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2093–100. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det104. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Absalan F, Ghannadi A, Kazerooni M. Reproductive outcome following thawed embryo transfer in management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Reprod Infertil. 2013;14:133–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Decleer W, Osmanagaoglu K, Meganck G, Devroey P. Slightly lower incidence of ectopic pregnancies in frozen embryo transfer cycles versus fresh in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:163–5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prados F, De los Santos MJ, Cabello Y, Buxaderas R, Segura A, Hernández J, et al. [Internet] Registro de la Sociedad Española de Fertilidad: Tecnicas de reproducción asistida (IA y FIV/ICSI). Año2.010. Available at: https://www.registrosef.com/public/Docs/sef2010_IAFIV.pdf

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources