Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Sep 29;6(4):1821-89.
doi: 10.3390/cancers6041821.

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology

Affiliations
Review

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology

Andrea Gallamini et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Since its introduction in the early nineties as a promising functional imaging technique in the management of neoplastic disorders, FDG-PET, and subsequently FDG-PET/CT, has become a cornerstone in several oncologic procedures such as tumor staging and restaging, treatment efficacy assessment during or after treatment end and radiotherapy planning. Moreover, the continuous technological progress of image generation and the introduction of sophisticated software to use PET scan as a biomarker paved the way to calculate new prognostic markers such as the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and the total amount of tumor glycolysis (TLG). FDG-PET/CT proved more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT scan in staging of several type of lymphoma or in detecting widespread tumor dissemination in several solid cancers, such as breast, lung, colon, ovary and head and neck carcinoma. As a consequence the stage of patients was upgraded, with a change of treatment in 10%-15% of them. One of the most evident advantages of FDG-PET was its ability to detect, very early during treatment, significant changes in glucose metabolism or even complete shutoff of the neoplastic cell metabolism as a surrogate of tumor chemosensitivity assessment. This could enable clinicians to detect much earlier the effectiveness of a given antineoplastic treatment, as compared to the traditional radiological detection of tumor shrinkage, which usually takes time and occurs much later.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Deauville score (DS).

References

    1. Avril N., Sassen S., Roylance R. Response to therapy in breast cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 2009;50:55S–63S. - PubMed
    1. Strauss L.G., Conti P.S. The applications of PET in clinical oncology. J. Nucl. Med. 1991;32:623–648. - PubMed
    1. Zasadny K.R., Wahl R.L. Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: Variations with body weight and a method for correction. Radiology. 1993;189:847–850. - PubMed
    1. American Joint Committee on Cancer . AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. Springer; New York, NY, USA: 2002.
    1. Adebonojo S.A., Bowser A.N., Moritz D.M., Corcoran P.C. Impact of revised stage classification of lung cancer on survival: A military experience. Chest. 1999;115:1507–1513. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources