Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 30;9(9):e108873.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108873. eCollection 2014.

Root foraging influences plant growth responses to earthworm foraging

Affiliations

Root foraging influences plant growth responses to earthworm foraging

Erin K Cameron et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Interactions among the foraging behaviours of co-occurring animal species can impact population and community dynamics; the consequences of interactions between plant and animal foraging behaviours have received less attention. In North American forests, invasions by European earthworms have led to substantial changes in plant community composition. Changes in leaf litter have been identified as a critical indirect mechanism driving earthworm impacts on plants. However, there has been limited examination of the direct effects of earthworm burrowing on plant growth. Here we show a novel second pathway exists, whereby earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris L.) impact plant root foraging. In a mini-rhizotron experiment, roots occurred more frequently in burrows and soil cracks than in the soil matrix. The roots of Achillea millefolium L. preferentially occupied earthworm burrows, where nutrient availability was presumably higher than in cracks due to earthworm excreta. In contrast, the roots of Campanula rotundifolia L. were less likely to occur in burrows. This shift in root behaviour was associated with a 30% decline in the overall biomass of C. rotundifolia when earthworms were present. Our results indicate earthworm impacts on plant foraging can occur indirectly via physical and chemical changes to the soil and directly via root consumption or abrasion and thus may be one factor influencing plant growth and community change following earthworm invasion. More generally, this work demonstrates the potential for interactions to occur between the foraging behaviours of plants and soil animals and emphasizes the importance of integrating behavioural understanding in foraging studies involving plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of experimental treatments.
Achillea millefolium and Campanula rotundifolia were grown individually with and without earthworms in 15 replicate pots (27 cm × 11 cm × 26 cm). Three Lumbricus terrestris earthworms were added to each of the earthworm treatment pots. A transparent mini-rhizotron tube (5.7 cm in diameter) ran lengthwise approximately 5 cm below the soil surface of each pot to allow mini-rhizotron images to be obtained. Each mini-rhizotron tube ran through five adjacent pots.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Occurrence of roots (±1 SE) in 6 mm × 6 mm grid cells containing burrows (filled circle), cracks (open circle), and soil (filled inverted triangle) for (A) Achillea millefolium and (B) Campanula rotundifolia over time.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Proportion of 6 mm ×6 mm grid cells with roots dying (± SE), out of all cells occupied by roots during the experiment, in soil, cracks, and burrows for Achillea millefolium and Campanula rotundifolia.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Shoot and root biomass in grams (± SE) for Achillea millefolium and Campanula rotundifolia with and without earthworms.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Railsback SF, Harvey BC (2013) Trait-mediated trophic interactions: is foraging theory keeping up? Trends Ecol Evol 28: 119–125. - PubMed
    1. Sih A, Cote J, Evans M, Fogarty S, Pruitt J (2012) Ecological implications of behavioural syndromes. Ecology Letters 15: 278–289 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01731.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cahill JF, McNickle GG, Haag JJ, Lamb EG, Nyanumba SM, et al. (2010) Plants integrate information about nutrients and neighbors. Science 328: 1657–1657 10.1126/science.1189736 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jensen EL, Dill LM, Cahill JF Jr (2011) Applying behavioral-ecological theory to plant defense: light-dependent movement in Mimosa pudica suggests a trade-off between predation risk and energetic reward. Am Nat 177: 377–381 10.1086/658343 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hutchings MJ, de Kroon H (1994) Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Advances in Ecological Research 25: 159–238.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources