Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 29;6(10):2899-911.
doi: 10.3390/toxins6102899.

Non-native (exotic) snake envenomations in the U.S., 2005-2011

Affiliations

Non-native (exotic) snake envenomations in the U.S., 2005-2011

Brandon J Warrick et al. Toxins (Basel). .

Abstract

Non-native (exotic) snakes are a problematic source of envenomation worldwide. This manuscript describes the current demographics, outcomes and challenges of non-native snakebites in the United States (U.S.). We performed a retrospective case series of the National Poison Data System (NPDS) database between 2005 and 2011. There were 258 human exposures involving at least 61 unique exotic venomous species (average = 37 per year; range = 33-40). Males comprised 79% and females 21%. The average age was 33 years with 16% less than 20 years old. 70% of bites occurred in a private residence and 86% were treated at a healthcare facility. 35% of cases received antivenom and 10% were given antibiotics. This study is compared to our previous study (1994-2004) in which there was a substantial coding error rate. Software modifications significantly reduced coding errors. Identification and acquisition of appropriate antivenoms pose a number of logistical difficulties in the management of these envenomations. In the U.S., poison centers have valuable systems and clinical roles in the provision of expert consultation and in the management of these cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Confirmed non-native snake exposures, 2005–2011.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Non-native envenomations by month, 2005–2011.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Viperid and elapid envenomation outcomes, 2005–2011.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Viperid and elapid clinical effects duration, 2005–2011.

Comment in

References

    1. Collis A., Fenili R. The Modern U.S. Reptile Industry. Georgetown Economic Services, LLC; Washington, DC, USA: 2011. [(accessed on 11 September 2014)]. Available online: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/ files/omb/assets/oira_1018/1018....
    1. Ivanyi C., Altimari W. Venomous reptile bites in academic research. Herp. Rev. 2004;35:49–50.
    1. Card W., Roberts D.T. Incidence of bites from venomous reptiles in North American zoos. Herpetol. Rev. 1996;27:15–16.
    1. kingsnake.com. [(accessed on 14 August 2014)]. Available online: http://www.kingsnake.com/events/index.php.
    1. kingsnake.com. [(accessed on 14 August 2014)]. Available online: http://market.kingsnake.com/index.php?cat=101.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources