Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Dec 1;39(25):2084-92.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000612.

Anterior surgical management of single-level cervical disc disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Anterior surgical management of single-level cervical disc disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Daniel J Lewis et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: Cost-effectiveness analysis with decision analysis and meta-analysis.

Objective: To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (with autograft, allograft, or spacers), anterior cervical discectomy without fusion (ACD), and cervical disc replacement (CDR) for the treatment of 1-level cervical disc disease.

Summary of background data: There is debate as to the optimal anterior surgical strategy to treat single-level cervical disc disease. Surgical strategies include 3 techniques of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (autograft, allograft, or spacer-assisted fusion), ACD, and CDR. Several controlled trials have compared these treatments but have yielded mixed results. Decision analysis provides a structure for making a quantitative comparison of the costs and outcomes of each treatment.

Methods: A literature search was performed and yielded 156 case series that fulfilled our search criteria describing nearly 17,000 cases. Data were abstracted from these publications and pooled meta-analytically to estimate the incidence of various outcomes, including index-level and adjacent-level reoperation. A decision analytic model calculated the expected costs in US dollars and outcomes in quality-adjusted life years for a typical adult patient with 1-level cervical radiculopathy subjected to each of the 5 approaches.

Results: At 5 years postoperatively, patients who had undergone ACD alone had significantly (P < 0.001) more quality-adjusted life years (4.885 ± 0.041) than those receiving other treatments. Patients with ACD also exhibited highly significant (P < 0.001) differences in costs, incurring the lowest societal costs ($16,558 ± $539). Follow-up data were inadequate for comparison beyond 5 years.

Conclusion: The results of our decision analytic model indicate advantages for ACD, both in effectiveness and costs, over other strategies. Thus, ACD is a cost-effective alternative to anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and CDR in patients with single-level cervical disc disease. Definitive conclusions about degenerative changes after ACD and adjacent-level disease after CDR await longer follow-up.

Level of evidence: 4.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Letters.
    Aleem IS, Gelfman R, Currier B. Aleem IS, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Feb;41(3):E184-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001342. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016. PMID: 26866744 No abstract available.
  • To the Editor.
    Malhotra NR, Lewis D, Attiah M, Burnett M, Stein S. Malhotra NR, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Feb;41(3):E185. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001358. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016. PMID: 26866745 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts