Patient expectations of primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- PMID: 25274098
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3364-z
Patient expectations of primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Abstract
Purpose: Unrealistic patient expectations have been shown to negatively influence patient-reported outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. Knowledge about patient expectations is important to associate preoperative expectations with the reasonable outcome of a specific procedure. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyse and to compare patient expectations of primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to assess the factors associated with patient expectations.
Methods: Preoperative expectations of 181 consecutive patients undergoing ACLR were assessed prospectively using a 5-item questionnaire. Primary ACLR (P-ACLR) was performed in 133 patients (73%), whereas 48 patients (27%) underwent revision ACLR (R-ACLR). The questionnaire assessed the expectation of the overall condition of the knee joint, return to sports, instability, pain, and risk of osteoarthritis.
Results: All patients expected a normal (38%) or nearly normal (62%) condition of the knee joint. Return to sports at the same level was expected by 91%. With regard to instability (pain), no instability (pain) independent of the activity level was expected by 77% (58%). No or only a slightly increased risk of the development of osteoarthritis was expected by 98%. The R-ACLR group showed a significantly lower expectation of the overall condition (p = 0.001), return to sports (p < 0.001), and pain (p = 0.002). No statistically significant difference was found between female and male patients (n.s.). In the P-ACLR group, patients with a history of previous knee surgery showed inferior expectations of return to sports (p = 0.015) and risk of osteoarthritis (p = 0.011). Age, number of previous knee surgeries, and pre-injury sports level significantly influenced patient expectations.
Conclusions: Overall, patient expectations of ACL reconstruction are high. Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction have lower but still demanding expectations. Younger patients, patients without a history of knee surgery, and highly active patients have higher expectations. Explicit patient information about realistic goals of ACL reconstruction seems to be necessary in order to prevent postoperative dissatisfaction despite a successful operation in the surgeons' point of view.
Level of evidence: Prospective case series, Level IV.
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Knee; Patient expectations.
Similar articles
-
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores knee laxity but shows inferior functional knee outcome compared with primary reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5059-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019. PMID: 30014185 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes of Isolated Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction or in Combination With Anatomic Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):324-333. doi: 10.1177/0363546518815888. Epub 2019 Jan 14. Am J Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 30640514
-
Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):580-4. doi: 10.1177/0363546515618381. Epub 2015 Dec 15. Am J Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 26672024
-
Outcomes of 1- Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;49(3):798-804. doi: 10.1177/0363546520923090. Epub 2020 Jul 16. Am J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 32673067
-
Early Operative Versus Delayed or Nonoperative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Pediatric Patients.J Athl Train. 2016 May;51(5):425-7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050.51.5.11. Epub 2016 May 31. J Athl Train. 2016. PMID: 27244126 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Current clinical practice and return-to-sport criteria after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a survey of Brazilian physical therapists.Braz J Phys Ther. 2021 May-Jun;25(3):242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.05.014. Epub 2020 Jun 4. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021. PMID: 32561136 Free PMC article.
-
Time for a Different Approach to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Educate and Create Realistic Expectations.Sports Med. 2019 Mar;49(3):357-363. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0995-0. Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 30284693
-
Quadriceps and Hamstrings Activation Peaks Earlier as Athletes Repeatedly Hop, but There are Differences Depending on ACL Reconstruction Technique.Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):418-428. doi: 10.26603/001c.94610. eCollection 2024. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2024. PMID: 38576837 Free PMC article.
-
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores knee laxity but shows inferior functional knee outcome compared with primary reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5059-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019. PMID: 30014185 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes after bone grafting in patients with and without ACL revision surgery: a retrospective study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 21;19(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2174-8. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018. PMID: 30031398 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous