Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan;36(1):22-7.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000593.

Vibro-EAS: a proposal for electroacoustic stimulation

Affiliations

Vibro-EAS: a proposal for electroacoustic stimulation

Sebastian P Schraven et al. Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Hypothesis: In situ evaluation of the vibration performance of a hybrid system for intracochlear fluid stimulation, constructed from a floating mass transducer (FMT) coupled to an electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) cochlea implant (CI) electrode.

Background: EAS uses both CI technology to restore severe-to-profound hearing loss at high frequencies and acoustic amplification for mild-to-moderate hearing loss in the low-to-mid frequency range. More patients with residual hearing are becoming candidates for EAS surgery because of the improved techniques for hearing preservation. Most patients with partial deafness fulfill the audiological criteria at low and mid-frequencies for the active middle-ear implant with FMT (VSB). The FMT of the VSB is a potential device for acoustical stimulation in EAS.

Methods: In seven fresh human temporal bones, stapes amplitude responses for fixation of a FMT to the long incus process (standard coupling) was compared with those for FMT fixation to a 20-mm inserted standard cochlea electrode array (31.5 mm) via the round window (Vibro-EAS). Vibration of the stapes footplate was measured by laser Doppler vibrometry.

Results: For 0.316 Vrms drive voltage, stimulation of the intracochlear fluid using a FMT-driven CI electrode (Vibro-EAS) yielded stapes amplitude responses comparable to those for acoustic stimulation with 84 dB SPL. These amplitude responses are 30 to 42 dB lower at frequencies up to 4 kHz than those for VSB standard coupling.

Conclusion: Intracochlear combined electrical and mechanical stimulation may be a viable technique for electroacoustic stimulation. A reliable technique for attachment or integration of the FMT to the cochlea electrode array has yet to be developed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types