Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014:2014:468515.
doi: 10.1155/2014/468515. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

Hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery

Affiliations
Review

Hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery

Priscila Carvalho Miranda et al. Int J Otolaryngol. 2014.

Abstract

In the past, it was thought that hearing loss patients with residual low-frequency hearing would not be good candidates for cochlear implantation since insertion was expected to induce inner ear trauma. Recent advances in electrode design and surgical techniques have made the preservation of residual low-frequency hearing achievable and desirable. The importance of preserving residual low-frequency hearing cannot be underestimated in light of the added benefit of hearing in noisy atmospheres and in music quality. The concept of electrical and acoustic stimulation involves electrically stimulating the nonfunctional, high-frequency region of the cochlea with a cochlear implant and applying a hearing aid in the low-frequency range. The principle of preserving low-frequency hearing by a "soft surgery" cochlear implantation could also be useful to the population of children who might profit from regenerative hair cell therapy in the future. Main aspects of low-frequency hearing preservation surgery are discussed in this review: its brief history, electrode design, principles and advantages of electric-acoustic stimulation, surgical technique, and further implications of this new treatment possibility for hearing impaired patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. von Ilberg CA, Baumann U, Kiefer J, Tillein J, Adunka OF. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade. Audiology and Neurotology. 2011;16(supplement 2):1–30. - PubMed
    1. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(5):796–802. - PubMed
    1. Mowry SE, Woodson E, Gantz BJ. New frontiers in cochlear implantation: acoustic plus electric hearing, hearing preservation, and more. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2012;45(1):187–203. - PubMed
    1. Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Karsten S, Fowler J, Reiss LA. Impact of hair cell preservation in cochlear implantation: combined electric and acoustic hearing. Otology and Neurotology. 2010;31(8):1227–1232. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hogan CA, Turner CW. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1998;104(1):432–441. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources