Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Apr;67(4):649-57.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.020. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

A genome-wide pleiotropy scan for prostate cancer risk

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A genome-wide pleiotropy scan for prostate cancer risk

Orestis A Panagiotou et al. Eur Urol. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: No single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) specific for aggressive prostate cancer have been identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS).

Objective: To test if SNPs associated with other traits may also affect the risk of aggressive prostate cancer.

Design, setting, and participants: SNPs implicated in any phenotype other than prostate cancer (p≤10(-7)) were identified through the catalog of published GWAS and tested in 2891 aggressive prostate cancer cases and 4592 controls from the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3). The 40 most significant SNPs were followed up in 4872 aggressive prostate cancer cases and 24,534 controls from the Prostate Cancer Association Group to Investigate Cancer Associated Alterations in the Genome (PRACTICAL) consortium.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for aggressive prostate cancer were estimated.

Results and limitations: A total of 4666 SNPs were evaluated by the BPC3. Two signals were seen in regions already reported for prostate cancer risk. rs7014346 at 8q24.21 was marginally associated with aggressive prostate cancer in the BPC3 trial (p=1.6×10(-6)), whereas after meta-analysis by PRACTICAL the summary OR was 1.21 (95% CI 1.16-1.27; p=3.22×10(-18)). rs9900242 at 17q24.3 was also marginally associated with aggressive disease in the meta-analysis (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.94; p=2.5×10(-6)). Neither of these SNPs remained statistically significant when conditioning on correlated known prostate cancer SNPs. The meta-analysis by BPC3 and PRACTICAL identified a third promising signal, marked by rs16844874 at 2q34, independent of known prostate cancer loci (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.19; p=4.67×10(-5)); it has been shown that SNPs correlated with this signal affect glycine concentrations. The main limitation is the heterogeneity in the definition of aggressive prostate cancer between BPC3 and PRACTICAL.

Conclusions: We did not identify new SNPs for aggressive prostate cancer. However, rs16844874 may provide preliminary genetic evidence on the role of the glycine pathway in prostate cancer etiology.

Patient summary: We evaluated whether genetic variants associated with several traits are linked to the risk of aggressive prostate cancer. No new such variants were identified.

Keywords: Aggressive prostate cancer; Genome-wide association study; Glycine; Pleiotropy; Single-nucleotide polymorphism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial disclosures: Konstantinos K. Tsilidis certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Manhattan plot for the 4666 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) evaluated in the genome-wide pleiotropy scan. Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3) results are shown in Light Orange and the meta-analysis results for the three strongest SNPs are shown in orange.

Comment in

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. - PubMed
    1. Eeles R, Goh C, Castro E, et al. The genetic epidemiology of prostate cancer and its clinical implications. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:18–31. - PubMed
    1. Al Olama AA, Kote-Jarai Z, Schumacher FR, et al. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies to identify prostate cancer susceptibility loci associated with aggressive and non-aggressive disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:408–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP, Tarone R, McLaughlin JK. The false-positive to false-negative ratio in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 2011;22:450–6. - PubMed
    1. Wacholder S. On standards of evidence. Epidemiology. 2011;22:464–6. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding