Program assessment framework for a rural palliative supportive service
- PMID: 25278757
- PMCID: PMC4147755
- DOI: 10.4137/PCRT.S11908
Program assessment framework for a rural palliative supportive service
Abstract
Although there are a number of quality frameworks available for evaluating palliative services, it is necessary to adapt these frameworks to models of care designed for the rural context. The purpose of this paper was to describe the development of a program assessment framework for evaluating a rural palliative supportive service as part of a community-based research project designed to enhance the quality of care for patients and families living with life-limiting chronic illness. A review of key documents from electronic databases and grey literature resulted in the identification of general principles for high-quality palliative care in rural contexts. These principles were then adapted to provide an assessment framework for the evaluation of the rural palliative supportive service. This framework was evaluated and refined using a community-based advisory committee guiding the development of the service. The resulting program assessment framework includes 48 criteria organized under seven themes: embedded within community; palliative care is timely, comprehensive, and continuous; access to palliative care education and experts; effective teamwork and communication; family partnerships; policies and services that support rural capacity and values; and systematic approach for measuring and improving outcomes of care. It is important to identify essential elements for assessing the quality of services designed to improve rural palliative care, taking into account the strengths of rural communities and addressing common challenges. The program assessment framework has potential to increase the likelihood of desired outcomes in palliative care provisions in rural settings and requires further validation.
Keywords: quality indicators; quality of care; rural palliative care.
Similar articles
-
Feasibility of a rural palliative supportive service.Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):3116. Epub 2015 May 4. Rural Remote Health. 2015. PMID: 25939666
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Wiisokotaatiwin: development and evaluation of a community-based palliative care program in Naotkamegwanning First Nation.Rural Remote Health. 2018 Apr;18(2):4317. doi: 10.22605/RRH4317. Epub 2018 Apr 28. Rural Remote Health. 2018. PMID: 29724108
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
-
Using a supportive care framework to understand and improve palliative care among cancer patients in Africa.Palliat Support Care. 2016 Jun;14(3):284-301. doi: 10.1017/S1478951515000796. Epub 2015 Jun 15. Palliat Support Care. 2016. PMID: 26073264 Review.
References
-
- Randall F, Downie RS. The Philosophy of Palliative Care: Critique and Reconstruction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2006.
-
- Randall F, Downie RS. Palliative Care Ethics: A Companion to All Specialties. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1999.
-
- Dy SM, Aslakson R, Wilson RF, et al. Evidence Report 208 (Prepared by Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract 290-2007-10061-I.) AHRQ Publication 12 (13)-E014-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Oct, 2012. [Accessed May 29, 2013]. Improving Health Care and Palliative Care for Advanced and Serious Illness. Closing the Quality Gap: Revisiting the State of the Science. http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm.
-
- Pasman HR, Brandt HE, Deliens L, Francke AL. Quality indicators for palliative care: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38(1):145–56. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources