Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Dec:60:64-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

High-speed circuit training vs hypertrophy training to improve physical function in sarcopenic obese adults: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

High-speed circuit training vs hypertrophy training to improve physical function in sarcopenic obese adults: a randomized controlled trial

Anoop Balachandran et al. Exp Gerontol. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Progressive loss of muscle and strength with age is often coincident with increases in adiposity, leading to a condition called sarcopenic obesity. Studies have shown sarcopenic obese adults to be at higher risk for declines in physical function. Despite this rising public health concern, no intervention studies currently exist in this population.

Methods: A total of 21 sarcopenic obese adults, 60 years or older, were randomized into two groups, strength/hypertrophy (SH, n=9) and high-speed circuit (HSC, n=8) and were trained for 15 weeks. The primary outcome was the SPPB modified as a measure of physical function, assessed by assessors blinded to randomization. Secondary outcomes were lower body and upper body power and strength, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), body fat % (BF%), skeletal muscle index (SMI), and grip strength (GRP).

Results: For the SPPB results favored HSC over SH (1.1, 95% CI (-.1 to 2.4), p=.08) and showed a moderate effect size (Hedge g=0.6, 95% CI (-0.4, 1.6)). For secondary outcomes, lower body power (mean difference=158 W, 95% CI (2, 315); p=.01) and RPE (mean difference=-1.5, 95% CI (-2.9, -0.12); p=.04) also favored HSC. IADL, SMI, BF%, upper and lower body strength and upper body power, showed no statistically significant differences between groups.

Conclusions: Considering the moderate effect size, the large treatment effect shown by the upper limit of the 95% CI, the low perceived exertion, and no adverse effects, HSC training should be further investigated with a larger sample size in sarcopenic obese adults.

Keywords: Elderly; Power training; Resistance training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources