[Cesarean scar defect]
- PMID: 25282945
[Cesarean scar defect]
Abstract
Background: Caesarean section has immediate complications and traditional, well known later, but of equal or greater importance are the risks for the next pregnancy, due to the possibility of uterine rupture, placenta accreta, placenta previa, pregnancy or cervical scar hysterorrhaphy, and other complications not well disseminated or known defects associated with scar hysterorrhaphy (dehiscence).
Objective: Show off frequency and caracteristics of the cesarean scar defects.
Material and method: Retrospective and observational study, by reviewing videos of patients subjected to exploration of the endocervical canal and uterine cavity whith hysteroscope in a 5 year period, in patients with a history of previous cesarean section, evaluating the integrity of the scar. The defects were classified into three categories according to the depth of the defect.
Results: Patients with previous c-section, 62.5% had a defect of the closure of the scar. The total dehiscence of the muscular layer was found in patients with 1, 2 and 3 or more c-section, and only 3 cases (12%) of the defects were found at the level of the isthmus.
Conclusion: Cesarean scar defects are more frequent than we assumed. Since they favour obstetric and gynecological obstetric pathology, with the increase in the number of patients who undergo caesarean section, this has become a health problem, and we must know and promote its relationship with abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary sterility.
Similar articles
-
The effect of surgery on subsequent pregnancy outcomes among patients with cesarean scar diverticulum.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 May;141(2):212-216. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12444. Epub 2018 Feb 14. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018. PMID: 29341106
-
Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;34(1):85-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6405. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19565535
-
[Women with previous caesarean or other uterine scar: epidemiological features].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Dec;41(8):697-707. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.022. Epub 2012 Nov 2. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012. PMID: 23123080 Review. French.
-
Impact of methods for uterine incision closure on repeat caesarean section scar of lower uterine segment.J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011 Sep;21(9):522-6. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011. PMID: 21914406 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment for Uterine Isthmocele, A Pouchlike Defect at the Site of a Cesarean Section Scar.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.09.022. Epub 2017 Oct 9. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29024799 Review.
Cited by
-
Uterine Cesarean Scar Tissue-An Immunohistochemical Study.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 18;60(4):651. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040651. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 38674297 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Menstrual Extension and Surgery Effectiveness with Ultrasound Parameters of Cesarean Section Scar Diverticulum in Patients Undergoing Transvaginal Uterine Diverticulum Repair.Mediators Inflamm. 2019 Dec 19;2019:7415891. doi: 10.1155/2019/7415891. eCollection 2019. Mediators Inflamm. 2019. PMID: 31933542 Free PMC article.
-
Pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women after ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids: A single-central retrospective study.Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 21;7(1):3977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04319-y. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28638108 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical