Prospective, randomized, multicenter, phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a French intergroup (Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, and Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie) study
- PMID: 25287828
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.1011
Prospective, randomized, multicenter, phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a French intergroup (Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, and Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie) study
Erratum in
-
Errata.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 20;33(12):1416. doi: 10.1200/jco.2015.61.9759. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25883365 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (ECX) with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatments in patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma.
Patients and methods: This open, randomized, phase III study was carried out in 71 centers. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric or EGJ cancer were randomly assigned to receive either ECX as first-line treatment (ECX arm) or FOLFIRI (FOLFIRI arm). Second-line treatment was predefined (FOLFIRI for the ECX arm and ECX for the FOLFIRI arm). The primary criterion was time-to-treatment failure (TTF) of the first-line therapy. Secondary criteria were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life.
Results: In all, 416 patients were included (median age, 61.4 years; 74% male). After a median follow-up of 31 months, median TTF was significantly longer with FOLFIRI than with ECX (5.1 v 4.2 months; P = .008). There was no significant difference between the two groups in median PFS (5.3 v 5.8 months; P = .96), median OS (9.5 v 9.7 months; P = .95), or response rate (39.2% v 37.8%). First-line FOLFIRI was better tolerated (overall rate of grade 3 to 4 toxicity, 69% v 84%; P < .001; hematologic adverse events [AEs], 38% v 64.5%; P < .001; nonhematologic AEs: 53% v 53.5%; P = .81).
Conclusion: FOLFIRI as first-line treatment for advanced gastric and EGJ cancer demonstrated significantly better TTF than did ECX. Other outcome results indicate that FOLFIRI is an acceptable first-line regimen in this setting and should be explored as a backbone regimen for targeted agents.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00374036.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Comment in
-
Gastrointestinal cancer: FOLFIRI-improving toxicity in first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec;11(12):684. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.184. Epub 2014 Oct 21. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014. PMID: 25331178 No abstract available.
-
Reply to E.C. Smyth et al and E. Elimova et al.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 20;33(21):2410-1. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.5550. Epub 2015 Jun 15. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26077234 No abstract available.
-
Time-to-Treatment Failure As the Primary End Point of a First-Line Advanced Gastric Cancer Randomized Trial: How Confused Would You Want Us to Be?J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 20;33(21):2410. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.8847. Epub 2015 Jun 15. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26077236 No abstract available.
-
Epirubicin, Cisplatin, and Capecitabine Versus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan for Esophagogastric Cancer: The Original and the Rest.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 20;33(21):2409. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7088. Epub 2015 Jun 15. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26077239 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials