Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Oct;168(10):e141983.
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1983. Epub 2014 Oct 6.

Prompting asthma intervention in Rochester-uniting parents and providers (PAIR-UP): a randomized trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prompting asthma intervention in Rochester-uniting parents and providers (PAIR-UP): a randomized trial

Jill S Halterman et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Importance: A disproportionate number of impoverished and minority children have asthma and receive suboptimal preventive care.

Objective: To evaluate whether the Prompting Asthma Intervention in Rochester-Uniting Parents and Providers (PAIR-UP) intervention, administered in primary care offices, improves the delivery of preventive care and reduces morbidity for urban children with asthma.

Design, setting, and participants: Cluster randomized trial in which 12 urban primary care practices were matched based on size and type and randomly allocated to the PAIR-UP intervention or usual care (UC). We enrolled 638 children aged 2 to 12 years with persistent or poorly controlled asthma in the waiting room prior to a visit with a clinician for any reason from October 2009 to January 2013. Blinded interviewers called caregivers within 2 weeks to inquire about preventive measures taken at the visit and called them 2 and 6 months later to assess symptoms.

Interventions: Children enrolled at PAIR-UP practices received prompts for the caregiver and clinician at the time of the visit that outlined the child's asthma severity or control as well as specific guideline-based recommendations to enhance preventive care. These practices also received educational resources and periodic feedback on their asthma care performance. The UC practices received copies of the asthma guidelines.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was symptom-free days (SFDs) per 2 weeks at the 2-month follow-up.

Results: We enrolled 638 children (participation rate of 80%; 36% were black, 36% were Hispanic, and 68% had Medicaid insurance). Groups were similar in demographic characteristics and asthma severity at baseline. At the index visit, more children in the PAIR-UP group received a preventive medication action (new medication, increased dose, recommendation to restart preventive medication) than in the UC group (58% vs 33%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9 to 3.9). More children in the PAIR-UP group than in the UC group received an asthma action plan (61% vs 23%; OR = 8.3; 95% CI, 3.7 to 18.7), discussions regarding asthma (93% vs 78%; OR = 4.5; 95% CI, 2.8 to 7.2), and secondhand smoke counseling (80% vs 63%; OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.5). At the 2-month follow-up, children in the PAIR-UP group had more SFDs per 2 weeks than those in the UC group (mean difference, 0.78 days; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.27). At 6 months, the improvement in SFDs was no longer statistically significant (mean difference, 0.56; 95% CI, -0.14 to 1.25).

Conclusions and relevance: The PAIR-UP intervention improved the delivery of preventive asthma care and reduced asthma morbidity for high-risk urban children with persistent asthma at 2 months, but the improvement in SFDs was no longer significant at 6 months.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01105754.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PAIR-UP CONSORT Diagram
Diagram to indicate numbers of subjects for enrollment and follow-up in the PAIR-UP study. Reasons for exclusion from the study are shown, along with the number of participants enrolled in each group, the number withdrawn from the study, and the number with completed follow-up surveys for medical record review and analysis.

Comment in

References

    1. National Asthma E, Prevention P. Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3): Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma-Summary Report 2007. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5 Suppl):S94–S138. - PubMed
    1. Expert panel report III: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. NIH publication No. 07-4051. Bethesda, MD: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services; National Institute of Health; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Asthma Education and Prevention Program; 2007.
    1. Wisnivesky JP, Lorenzo J, Lyn-Cook R, et al. Barriers to adherence to asthma management guidelines among inner-city primary care providers. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Sep;101(3):264–270. - PubMed
    1. Okelo SO, Butz AM, Sharma R, et al. Interventions to modify health care provider adherence to asthma guidelines: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2013 Sep;132(3):517–534. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee G, Le T. Training Pediatricians to Adhere to Asthma Guidelines. Pediatric Allergy, Immunology & Pulmonology. 2013;26(3):110–114. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data