Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 1:79:344-8.
doi: 10.12659/PJR.890806. eCollection 2014.

Assessment of Radiation doses to Paediatric Patients in Computed Tomography Procedures

Affiliations

Assessment of Radiation doses to Paediatric Patients in Computed Tomography Procedures

Khalid Alzimami. Pol J Radiol. .

Abstract

Background: The use of pediatric CT that had recently emerged as a valuable imaging tool has increased rapidly with an annual growth estimated at about 10% per year. Worldwide, there is a remarkable increase in the number of CT examinations performed. The purposes of this study are to: (i) to measure the radiation dose and estimate the effective doses to pediatric patients during CT for chest, abdomen and brain.

Material/methods: A total of 182 patients were investigated. CT scanners that participated in this study are helical CT scanners (64 slices, 16 slices and dual slices). Organ and surface dose to specific radiosensitive organs were estimated by using software from National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB).

Results: For all patients, the age was ranged between 1.12 month-10.0 years while the weight was ranged between 5.0 kg to 29.0 kg. The DLP was 320.58 mGy·cm, 79.93 mGy·cm, 66.63 mGy·cm for brain, abdomen and chest respectively. The effective dose was, 2.05, 1.8, 1.08 mSv for brain, abdomen and chest respectively.

Conclusions: The patient dose is independent of CT modality and depends on operator experience and CT protocol. The study has shown a great need for referring criteria, continuous training of staff in radiation protection concepts. Further studies are required in order to establish a reference level in Sudan.

Keywords: Dose-Response Relationship; Radiation; Relative Biological Effectiveness; Tomography Scanners; X-Ray Computed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seeram E. Computed Tomography: Physical Principles, Clinical Applications, and Quality Control. 3rd edition. W.B. Saunders Co; USA: 2008.
    1. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiology Protection of Patients in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy. Proceedings of an International Conference; Malaga, Spain. 2001.
    1. Amis ES, Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4(5):272–84. - PubMed
    1. Arch ME, Frush DP. Pediatric body MDCT: A 5-year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):611–17. - PubMed
    1. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2–4. Vol. 37. Pergamon; Oxford, UK: 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources