Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):e109557.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109557. eCollection 2014.

Is the effect of aerobic exercise on cognition a placebo effect?

Affiliations

Is the effect of aerobic exercise on cognition a placebo effect?

Cary R Stothart et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

A number of studies and meta-analyses conclude that aerobic fitness (walking) interventions improve cognition. Such interventions typically compare improvements from these interventions to an active control group in which participants engage in non-aerobic activities (typically stretching and toning) for an equivalent amount of time. However, in the absence of a double-blind design, the presence of an active control group does not necessarily control for placebo effects; participants might expect different amounts of improvement for the treatment and control interventions. We conducted a large survey to explore whether people expect greater cognitive benefits from an aerobic exercise intervention compared to a control intervention. If participants expect greater improvement following aerobic exercise, then the benefits of such interventions might be due in part to a placebo effect. In general, expectations did not differ between aerobic and non-aerobic interventions. If anything, some of the results suggest the opposite (e.g., respondents expected the control, non-aerobic intervention to yield bigger memory gains). These results provide the first evidence that cognitive improvements following aerobic fitness training are not due to differential expectations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Percentage of participants expecting improvement as a function of intervention group and task for all participants.
Percentage of participants within each intervention group who believed that completion of the intervention presented to them would improve task performance. Includes both sedentary and non-sedentary participants.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Believed improvement amount as a function of intervention group and task type for all participants.
Mean amount of improvement participants believed completion of the intervention presented to them would create. Includes both sedentary and non-sedentary participants. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Percentage of participants expecting improvement as a function of intervention group and task for sedentary participants.
Percentage of participants within each intervention group who believed that completion of the intervention presented to them would improve task performance. Includes only sedentary participants.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Believed improvement amount as a function of intervention group and task type for all participants.
Mean amount of improvement participants believed completion of the intervention presented to them would create. Includes only sedentary participants. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Boot WR, Simons DJ, Stothart C, Stutts C (2013) The pervasive problem with placebos in psychology: Why active control groups are not sufficient to rule out placebo effects. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8: 445–454. - PubMed
    1. Colcombe S, Kramer AF (2003) Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Science 14: 125–130. - PubMed
    1. Hindin SB, Zelinski EM (2012) Extended practice and aerobic exercise interventions benefit untrained cognitive outcomes in older adults: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 60: 136–141. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith PJ, Blumenthal JA, Hoffman BM, Cooper H, Strauman TA, et al. (2010) Aerobic exercise and neurocognitive performance: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Psychosomatic Medicine 72: 239–252. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Voss M, Vivar C, Kramer AF, van Praag H (2013) Bridging animal and human models of exercise-induced brain plasticity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17: 525–544. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types