Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 7:4:6539.
doi: 10.1038/srep06539.

The effect of sample storage on the Peroxidation of Leukocytes Index Ratio (PLIR) measure

Affiliations

The effect of sample storage on the Peroxidation of Leukocytes Index Ratio (PLIR) measure

Ilaria Peluso et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Delays in processing are frequent because of problems associated with transporting the samples to the laboratory. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effect of sample storage on the Peroxidation of Leukocytes Index Ratio (PLIR). Differences between PLIR values of lymphocytes (PLIR-L), monocytes (PLIR-M) and granulocytes (PLIR-G) were observed in fresh samples. Sample storage affected the evaluation of PLIR. In particular, PLIR-L was lower in stored samples compared to fresh samples. In conclusion, our results suggest that fresh samples are recommended for assessing the PLIR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Typical dot plots FSC vs. SSC (A) and FL4 (CD45-APC) vs. SSC (B); L: lymphocytes, M: monocytes, G: granulocytes, D: dead cells and/or debris. Typical dot plots Derived (FL1/FL2) vs. FL4 of cells un-stimulated (UNST) (C) or treated with PMA (1 μg/ml) (D) or AAPH (10 mM) (E and F) for 30 min.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Raw data of PLIR values of lymphocytes (L), monocytes (M) and granulocytes (G), measured in fresh samples or samples stored at 18–22°C or 4–8°C for 24 h (A). Comparisons for factor sample within L: †p < 0.05, ‡p < 0.01; within M: §p < 0.01. Comparisons for factor cell within sample: L versus G or M **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Typical dot plots Derived (FL1/FL2) versus SSC of L, M, and G from samples stored at 4–8°C for 24 h, un-stimulated (UNST) (B) or treated with Trolox (10 μM) (C), AAPH (10 mM) (D) or PMA (1 μg/ml) (E). D: dead cells and/or debris.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Knasmuller S. et al. Use of conventional and -omics based methods for health claims of dietary antioxidants: a critical overview. Br. J. Nutr. 99, ES3–ES52 (2008). - PubMed
    1. Ghiselli A., Serafini M., Maiani G., Azzini E. & Ferro-Luzzi A. A fluorescence-based method for measuring total plasma antioxidant capability. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 18, 29–36 (1995). - PubMed
    1. Benzie I. F. F. & Strain J. J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of antioxidant power: the FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 239, 70–76 (1996). - PubMed
    1. Basiglio C. L. et al. Complement activation and disease: protective effects of hyperbilirubinaemia. Clin. Sci. (Lond). 118, 99–113 (2009). - PubMed
    1. Alvarez-Lario B. & Macarrón-Vicente J. Is there anything good in uric acid? QJM. 104, 1015–1024 (2011). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources