Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):e108817.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108817. eCollection 2014.

Infants learn what they want to learn: responding to infant pointing leads to superior learning

Affiliations

Infants learn what they want to learn: responding to infant pointing leads to superior learning

Katarina Begus et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The majority of current developmental models prioritise a pedagogical approach to knowledge acquisition in infancy, in which infants play a relatively passive role as recipients of information. In view of recent evidence, demonstrating that infants use pointing to express interest and solicit information from adults, we set out to test whether giving the child the leading role in deciding what information to receive leads to better learning. Sixteen-month-olds were introduced to pairs of novel objects and, once they had pointed to an object, were shown a function for either the object they had chosen, or the object they had ignored. Ten minutes later, infants replicated the functions of chosen objects significantly more than those of un-chosen objects, despite having been equally visually attentive during demonstrations on both types of objects. These results show that offering information in response to infants' communicative gestures leads to superior learning (Experiment 1) and that this difference in performance is due to learning being facilitated when infants' pointing was responded to, not hindered when their pointing was ignored (Experiment 2), highlighting the importance of infants' own active engagement in acquiring information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Materials and experimental set-up.
(a) Photographs of the 8 novel objects used in the study. (b) Schematic representation of the experimental scene.

References

    1. Csibra G, Gergely G (2009) Natural Pedagogy. Trends Cogn Sci 13(4): 148–153. - PubMed
    1. Csibra G (2010) Recognising communicative intentions in infancy. Mind Lang 25(2): 141–168.
    1. Horner VK, Whiten A (2005) Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children. Anim Cogn 8: 164–181. - PubMed
    1. Lyons DE, Young AG, Keil FC (2007) The hidden structure of overimitation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(19): 751–756. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith LB, Yu C, Pereira AF (2011) Not you mother’s view: the dynamics of toddler visual experience. Dev Sci 14(1): 9–17. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources