Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec;15(3):267-74.
doi: 10.1111/dewb.12071. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

Sharing the Knowledge: Sharing Aggregate Genomic Findings with Research Participants in Developing Countries

Review

Sharing the Knowledge: Sharing Aggregate Genomic Findings with Research Participants in Developing Countries

Angeliki Kerasidou. Dev World Bioeth. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Returning research results to participants is recognised as an obligation that researchers should always try to fulfil. But can we ascribe the same obligation to researchers who conduct genomics research producing only aggregated findings? And what about genomics research conducted in developing countries? This paper considers Beskow's et al. argument that aggregated findings should also be returned to research participants. This recommendation is examined in the context of genomics research conducted in developing countries. The risks and benefits of attempting such an exercise are identified, and suggestions on ways to avoid some of the challenges are proposed. I argue that disseminating the findings of genomic research to participating communities should be seen as sharing knowledge rather than returning results. Calling the dissemination of aggregate, population level information returning results can be confusing and misleading as participants might expect to receive individual level information. Talking about sharing knowledge is a more appropriate way of expressing and communicating the outcome of population genomic research. Considering the knowledge produced by genomics research a worthwhile output that should be shared with the participants and approaching the exercise as a 'sharing of knowledge', could help mitigate the risks of unrealistic expectations and misunderstanding of findings, whilst promoting trusting and long lasting relationships with the participating communities.

Keywords: aggregate results; developing countries; genomics; returning results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wolf SM, et al. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet Med. 2012;14:361–384. - PMC - PubMed
    2. Beskow LM, Smolek SJ. Prospective biorepository participants’ perspectives on access to research results. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2009;4:99. - PMC - PubMed
    3. Dixon-Woods M, et al. Providing the results of research to participants: a mixed-method study of the benefits and challenges of a consultative approach. Clinical Trials. 2011;8:330–341. - PubMed
    4. MacNeil SD, Fernandez CV. Informing research participants of research results: analys is of Canadian university based research ethics board policies. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2006;32:49–54. - PMC - PubMed
    5. Fernandez CV, et al. Informing Study Participants of Research Results: An Ethical Imperative. IRB: Ethics and Human Research. 2003;25:12–19. - PubMed
    6. Fabsitz RR, et al. Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants: Updated Guidelines From a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group. Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics. 2010;3:574–580. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fernandez, et al.
    1. Richardson HS. Incidental findings and ancillary-care obligations. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36:256–270. - PMC - PubMed
    1. NBAC . Research involving human biological materials: ethical issues and policy guidance. National Bioethics Advisory Committee; Rockville, Marryland: 1999.
    1. Ibid. p. 72.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources