Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jan;110(1):174-82.
doi: 10.1111/add.12756. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

Plain cigarette packs do not exert Pavlovian to instrumental transfer of control over tobacco-seeking

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Plain cigarette packs do not exert Pavlovian to instrumental transfer of control over tobacco-seeking

Lee Hogarth et al. Addiction. 2015 Jan.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Aims: To gain insight into the potential impact of plain tobacco packaging policy, two experiments were undertaken to test whether 'prototype' plain compared with branded UK cigarette pack stimuli would differentially elicit instrumental tobacco-seeking in a nominal Pavlovian to instrumental transfer (PIT) procedure.

Design, setting and participants: Two experiments were undertaken at the University of Bristol UK, with a convenience sample of adult smokers (experiment 1, n = 23, experiment 2, n = 121).

Measurement: In both experiments, smokers were trained on a concurrent choice procedure in which two responses earned points for cigarettes and chocolate, respectively, before images of branded and plain packs were tested for capacity to elicit the tobacco-seeking response in extinction. The primary outcome was percentage choice of the tobacco- over the chocolate-seeking response in plain pack, branded pack and no-stimulus conditions.

Findings: Both experiments found that branded packs primed a greater percentage of tobacco-seeking (overall mean = 62%) than plain packs (overall mean = 53%) and the no-stimulus condition (overall mean = 52%; Ps ≤ 0.01, ŋp (2) s ≥ 0.16), and that there was no difference in percentage tobacco-seeking between plain packs and the no-stimulus condition (Ps ≥ 0.17, ŋp (2) s ≤ 0.04). Plain tobacco packs showed an overall 9% reduction in the priming of a tobacco choice response compared to branded tobacco packs.

Conclusions: Plain packaging may reduce smoking in current smokers by degrading cue-elicited tobacco-seeking.

Keywords: Cue-reactivity; Pavlovian to instrumental transfer; plain packaging; public health; smoking cessation; tobacco-seeking..

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of the cigarette pack stimuli presented on-screen prior to choice between the tobacco- versus chocolate-seeking response in the Pavlovian to instrumental transfer (PIT) test: (a) plain pack; (b) branded pack
Figure 2
Figure 2
The vertical axis shows the mean percentage choice of the tobacco- versus chocolate-seeking response [± standard error of the mean (SEM)] during the Pavlovian to instrumental transfer (PIT) test (50% = equal choice or indifference). The horizontal axis shows the stimulus that was presented on the screen before a response choice was made: either no-stimulus, an image of a plain pack (Fig. 1a) or a branded pack (Fig. 1b). In both experiments, the branded pack stimulus primed tobacco-seeking more than the no-stimulus and plain pack conditions, and the latter two conditions did not differ

References

    1. Stead M, Moodie C, Angus K, Bauld L, McNeill A, Thomas J, et al. Is consumer response to plain/standardised tobacco packaging consistent with framework convention on tobacco control guidelines? A systematic review of quantitative studies. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75919. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brose LS, Chong CB, Aspinall E, Michie S, McEwen A. Effects of standardised cigarette packaging on craving, motivation to stop and perceptions of cigarettes and packs. Psychol Health. 2014;29:849–860. - PubMed
    1. Moodie C, Mackintosh AM, Hastings G, Ford A. Young adult smokers’ perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study. Tob Control. 2011;20:367–373. - PubMed
    1. Moodie CS, Mackintosh AM. Young adult women smokers’ response to using plain cigarette packaging: a naturalistic approach. BMJ Open. 2013;3 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Munafò MR, Roberts N, Bauld L, Leonards U. Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction. 2011;106:1505–1510. - PubMed

Publication types