Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Feb;142(2):290-302.
doi: 10.1017/S0031182014001486. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

Co-feeding transmission in Lyme disease pathogens

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Co-feeding transmission in Lyme disease pathogens

Maarten J Voordouw. Parasitology. 2015 Feb.
Free PMC article

Abstract

This review examines the phenomenon of co-feeding transmission in tick-borne pathogens. This mode of transmission is critical for the epidemiology of several tick-borne viruses but its importance for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, the causative agents of Lyme borreliosis, is still controversial. The molecular mechanisms and ecological factors that facilitate co-feeding transmission are therefore examined with particular emphasis on Borrelia pathogens. Comparison of climate, tick ecology and experimental infection work suggests that co-feeding transmission is more important in European than North American systems of Lyme borreliosis, which potentially explains why this topic has gained more traction in the former continent than the latter. While new theory shows that co-feeding transmission makes a modest contribution to Borrelia fitness, recent experimental work has revealed new ecological contexts where natural selection might favour co-feeding transmission. In particular, co-feeding transmission might confer a fitness advantage in the Darwinian competition among strains in mixed infections. Future studies should investigate the ecological conditions that favour the evolution of this fascinating mode of transmission in tick-borne pathogens.

Keywords: tick-borne pathogens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The diagram shows (A) co-feeding (nymph-to-larva) transmission and (B) systemic (host-to-larva) transmission of Borrelia spirochaetes in a rodent reservoir host. Co-feeding transmission can occur when ticks feed in close spatial and temporal proximity on the same host. Larva 2 does not acquire spirochaetes via co-feeding transmission because it is too far away from the infected nymph. Systemic transmission occurs once the spirochaetes have had enough time to disseminate to all the relevant tissues of the reservoir host, which usually takes about 2 weeks. Under systemic transmission, larvae can acquire spirochaetes by attaching anywhere on the infected mouse.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alekseev A. N. and Chunikhin S. P. (1990). The exchange of the tick-borne encephalitis virus between ixodid ticks feeding jointly on animals with a subthreshold level of viremia. Meditsinskaia Parazitologiia (Mosk) 2, 48–50. - PubMed
    1. Andersson M., Scherman K., Raberg L. and Råberg L. (2013). Multiple-strain infections of Borrelia afzelii: a role for within-host interactions in the maintenance of antigenic diversity? The American Naturalist 181, 545–554. - PubMed
    1. Baranton G., Seinost G., Theodore G., Postic D. and Dykhuizen D. (2001). Distinct levels of genetic diversity of Borrelia burgdorferi are associated with different aspects of pathogenicity. Research in Microbiology 152, 149–156. - PubMed
    1. Barthold S. W. (1999). Specificity of infection-induced immunity among Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species. Infection and Immunity 67, 36–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brisson D. and Dykhuizen D. E. (2004). ospC diversity in Borrelia burgdorferi: different hosts are different niches. Genetics 168, 713–722. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types