Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1989 Aug;33(8):1193-7.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.8.1193.

Randomized prospective study comparing vancomycin with teicoplanin in the treatment of infections associated with Hickman catheters

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized prospective study comparing vancomycin with teicoplanin in the treatment of infections associated with Hickman catheters

S R Smith et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Aug.

Abstract

In 72 episodes of suspected or proven Hickman-catheter-associated infection occurring in 59 patients with various hematological disorders, patients were assigned to treatment with either vancomycin or teicoplanin in a randomized nonblinded prospective study. Of 60 episodes evaluable for response, 28 were treated with vancomycin and 32 were treated with teicoplanin. Sixteen infective episodes were microbiologically documented in the vancomycin group, and twenty-one were microbiologically documented in the teicoplanin group. Microbiologically and clinically documented infections treated with vancomycin had an 80% response rate, compared with a 69% response rate for those treated with teicoplanin (P = 0.316). Adverse events occurred in nine (25%) of the episodes in the vancomycin group, compared with three (8%) in the teicoplanin group (P = 0.044). Teicoplanin may provide an effective alternative to vancomycin in the treatment of Hickman-catheter-associated infection in patients with hematological malignancies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976 Oct;143(4):634-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Apr;7(2):130-4 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1980 May 15;302(20):1106-9 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1980 May 10;1(8176):993-4 - PubMed
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Sep;153(3):369-73 - PubMed