Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Apr:51:1-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Brief alcohol interventions for adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Emily E Tanner-Smith et al. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

This study reports findings from a meta-analysis summarizing the effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions for adolescents (age 11-18) and young adults (age 19-30). We identified 185 eligible study samples using a comprehensive literature search and synthesized findings using random-effects meta-analyses with robust standard errors. Overall, brief alcohol interventions led to significant reductions in alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems among adolescents (g = 0.27 and g = 0.19) and young adults (g = 0.17 and g = 0.11). These effects persisted for up to 1 year after intervention and did not vary across participant demographics, intervention length, or intervention format. However, certain intervention modalities (e.g., motivational interviewing) and components (e.g., decisional balance, goal-setting exercises) were associated with larger effects. We conclude that brief alcohol interventions yield beneficial effects on alcohol-related outcomes for adolescents and young adults that are modest but potentially worthwhile given their brevity and low cost.

Keywords: Adolescents; Brief alcohol intervention; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study identification flow diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatter plots of method-adjusted effect sizes and posttest follow-up timing, by age group and outcome type Notes: Effect sizes adjusted for study method characteristics and shown proportionate to random-effects inverse variance weights. Fitted values and confidence intervals from meta-regression with robust variance estimates. Dashed line shown at null value of zero.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agostinelli G, Brown JM, Miller WR. Effects of normative feedback on consumption among heavy drinking college students. Journal of Drug Education. 1995;25:31–40. doi:10.2190/XD56-D6WR-7195-EAL3. - PubMed
    1. Allison DL. Comparable effects of the use of a computer-assisted, facilitative teaching approach to a traditional lecture teaching approach on college students' learning about and subsequent use of alcohol. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2002;64(10):3604. (UMI No. 3110324)
    1. Baer JS, Kivlahan DR, Blume AW, McKnight P, Marlatt GA. Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-year follow-up and natural history. American Journal of Public Health. 2001;91:1310–1316. doi:10.2105/ajph.91.8.1310. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bailey KA, Baker AL, Webster RA, Lewin TJ. Pilot randomized controlled trial of a brief alcohol intervention group for adolescents. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2004;23:157–166. doi:10.1080/09595230410001704136. - PubMed
    1. Barnett NP, Monti PM, Wood MD. Motivational interviewing for alcohol-involved adolescents in the emergency room. In: Wagner EF, Waldron H, editors. Innovations in adolescent substance abuse interventions. Bergman Press; New York, NY: 2001. pp. 143–168. doi:10.1016/B978-008043577-0/50027-4.

Publication types