Is bacteremic sepsis associated with higher mortality in transplant recipients than in nontransplant patients? A matched case-control propensity-adjusted study
- PMID: 25301215
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu789
Is bacteremic sepsis associated with higher mortality in transplant recipients than in nontransplant patients? A matched case-control propensity-adjusted study
Erratum in
-
Kalil AC et al (Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60:216-22).Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 15;60(10):1590. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ223. Epub 2015 Mar 22. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25800498 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is a serious complication of solid organ transplant (SOT). Evidence on survival differences between SOT recipients and non-SOT patients with sepsis is lacking.
Methods: This was a matched, case-control propensity-adjusted study. Conditional logistic regression was performed for risk factor analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression for survival analysis.
Results: Three hundred sixty-nine patients (123 cases; 246 controls) diagnosed with blood culture-proven sepsis were matched 1:2 by age, sex, and hospital location. The distribution of allografts was 36.6% kidney, 34.1% liver, 13% kidney-pancreas, 7.3% small bowel/liver, 5.7% heart/lung, and 3.3% multivisceral. The conditional logistic regression showed that the following factors were significantly more frequently associated with SOT compared to non-SOT: higher number of comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] = 8.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.48-45.44], P = .016); higher Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score (OR = 1.2 [95% CI, 1.07-1.32], P = .001); presence of nosocomial infection (OR = 36.3 [95% CI, 9.71-135.96], P < .0001); appropriate initial antibiotics (OR = 0.04 [95% CI, .006-.23], P < .0001); and lower white blood cell count (OR = 0.93 [95% CI, .89-.97], P < .0001). Cox proportional hazards regression showed that after all adjustments for clinical presentation, severity of illness, and types of infection, SOT recipients with sepsis had a significantly lower risk of death at 28 days (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.22 [95% CI, .09-.54], P = .001) and at 90 days (HR = 0.43 [95% CI, .20-.89], P = .025).
Conclusions: The 28-day and 90-day mortality were significantly decreased for transplant recipients compared with nontransplant patients. These findings suggest that the immunosuppression associated with transplantation may provide a survival advantage to transplant recipients with sepsis through modulation of the inflammatory response.
Keywords: mortality; sepsis; transplantation.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
Time to antibiotics in solid organ transplant recipients with gram-negative rod bloodstream infections.Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 15;60(12):1868-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ166. Epub 2015 Mar 3. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25740795 No abstract available.
-
Rapid access to comprehensive care may explain better outcomes in persons with sepsis with solid organ transplant versus those without solid organ transplant.Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 15;60(12):1869-70. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ167. Epub 2015 Mar 3. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25740796 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Reply to Thomason et al and Bahr et al.Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 15;60(12):1870-1. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ169. Epub 2015 Mar 3. Clin Infect Dis. 2015. PMID: 25740797 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources