Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;21(5):224-33.
doi: 10.3747/co.21.1923.

Implementing a regional oncology information system: approach and lessons learned

Affiliations

Implementing a regional oncology information system: approach and lessons learned

W K Evans et al. Curr Oncol. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Rationale: Paper-based medical record systems are known to have major problems of inaccuracy, incomplete data, poor accessibility, and challenges to patient confidentiality. They are also an inefficient mechanism of record-sharing for interdisciplinary patient assessment and management, and represent a major problem for keeping current and monitoring quality control to facilitate improvement. To address those concerns, national, regional, and local health care authorities have increased the pressure on oncology practices to upgrade from paper-based systems to electronic health records.

Objectives: Here, we describe and discuss the challenges to implementing a region-wide oncology information system across four independent health care organizations, and we describe the lessons learned from the initial phases that are now being applied in subsequent activities of this complex project.

Results: The need for change must be shared across centres to increase buy-in, adoption, and implementation. It is essential to establish physician leadership, commitment, and engagement in the process. Work processes had to be revised to optimize use of the new system. Culture change must be included in the change management strategy. Furthermore, training and resource requirements must be thoroughly planned, implemented, monitored, and modified as required for effective adoption of new work processes and technology. Interfaces must be established with multiple existing electronic systems across the region to ensure appropriate patient flow. Periodic assessment of the existing project structure is necessary, and adjustments are often required to ensure that the project meets its objectives.

Conclusions: The implementation of region-wide oncology information systems across different health practice locations has many challenges. Leadership is essential. A strong, collaborative information-sharing strategy across the region and with the supplier is essential to identify, discuss, and resolve implementation problems. A structure that supports project management and accountability contributes to success.

Keywords: Electronic medical records; implementation; oncology information systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The revised project structure used to guide implementation of the regional oncology information system (ois).

References

    1. Ashbury FD, Madlensky L, Raich P, et al. Antidepressant prescribing in community cancer care. Supportive Care Cancer. 2003;11:278–85. - PubMed
    1. Bates DW. Getting in step: electronic health records and their role in care coordination. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:174–6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1252-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kralj B, Iverson DC, Hotz K, Ashbury FD. The impact of computerized clinical reminders on physician prescribing behavior. Am J Med Qual. 2003;18:197–203. doi: 10.1177/106286060301800504. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deutscher D, Hart DL, Dickstein R, Horn SD, Gutvirtz M. Implementing an integrated electronic outcomes and electronic health record process to create a foundation for clinical practice improvement. Phys Ther. 2008;88:270–85. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060280. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kanas G, Morimoto L, Mowat F, O’Malley C, Fryzek J, Nordyke R. Use of electronic medical records in oncology outcomes research. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;2:1–14. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S8411. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources