Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):79-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

Laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to a biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to weight loss failure: our algorithm

Affiliations

Laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to a biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to weight loss failure: our algorithm

Idan Carmeli et al. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Background: Failed sleeve gastrectomy (SG), defined by inadequate weight loss or weight regain, can be treated by a laparoscopic conversion to a biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (DS) or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). We report the outcomes of these procedures after SG failure.

Methods: All patients who underwent DS (n=9) or RYGB (n=10) due to inadequate weight loss or weight regain between December 2006 and November 2012 after a failed SG were enrolled.

Results: The mean pre-SG weight and body mass index (BMI) for the DS and RYGB patients were 143±36 kg and 51.5±11 kg/m2 and 120±26 kg and 44.5±5 kg/m2, respectively. The interval between the SG and the conversion to DS and to RYGB was 27±18 months and 36±17 months, respectively. The operation time and hospital stay were 191±64 minutes and 4.3±2.4 days for DS, and 111±37 minutes and 3.1±1.1 days for RYGB. At reoperation, the weight, BMI and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) were 113±22 kg, 43±6 kg/m2 and 28±16.5% and 107±27.5 kg, 40±5.7 kg/m2 and 25±12.7% (all P>.05), for the DS and RYGB, respectively. None of the patients were lost to follow-up. The post-DS weight, BMI, and %EWL were 84±19 kg, 30.7±7.4 kg/m2, and 80±40%. The post-RYGB weight, BMI, and %EWL were 81±21 kg, 30.2±4.8 kg/m2, and 65.5±34% (all P>.05).

Conclusion: DS and RYGB are feasible and effective operations after a failed SG. The DS yields a greater weight loss. The mechanism of failure should guide selection of the second procedure.

Keywords: Conversional bariatric surgery; Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch; Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types