Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Sep;15(3):313-6.

Comparison of fracture resistance in post restorations in primary maxillary incisors

Affiliations
  • PMID: 25306151
Comparative Study

Comparison of fracture resistance in post restorations in primary maxillary incisors

A Baghalian et al. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: This in vitro study aimed to test the fracture resistance of 4 different posts used in the restoration of severely decayed primary incisors.

Materials and methods: Fifty primary incisors were selected for this study and sectioned 1 mm above the CEJ. After filing and irrigation of the root canal space, the canals were obturated with Metapex and 3 mm of post space was prepared inside the canals. Intact glass fiber posts, split-ended glass fiber posts, composite resin posts, and orthodontic γ 'gamma' wire posts were used as intracanal posts and the final composite resin restoration was placed using a paediatric strip crown. After thermocycling of the specimens, the fracture resistance was measured using a universal testing machine.

Results: The mean fracture resistance of split- ended glass fiber posts was higher than the other groups, however, there was no significant difference between any of the groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Split-ended glass fiber posts seem to be a more appropriate option for full coverage restorations in primary incisors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources