Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;16(4):363-385.
doi: 10.1007/s10109-014-0202-2. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

Entropy, complexity, and spatial information

Affiliations

Entropy, complexity, and spatial information

Michael Batty et al. J Geogr Syst. 2014.

Abstract

We pose the central problem of defining a measure of complexity, specifically for spatial systems in general, city systems in particular. The measures we adopt are based on Shannon's (in Bell Syst Tech J 27:379-423, 623-656, 1948) definition of information. We introduce this measure and argue that increasing information is equivalent to increasing complexity, and we show that for spatial distributions, this involves a trade-off between the density of the distribution and the number of events that characterize it; as cities get bigger and are characterized by more events-more places or locations, information increases, all other things being equal. But sometimes the distribution changes at a faster rate than the number of events and thus information can decrease even if a city grows. We develop these ideas using various information measures. We first demonstrate their applicability to various distributions of population in London over the last 100 years, then to a wider region of London which is divided into bands of zones at increasing distances from the core, and finally to the evolution of the street system that characterizes the built-up area of London from 1786 to the present day. We conclude by arguing that we need to relate these measures to other measures of complexity, to choose a wider array of examples, and to extend the analysis to two-dimensional spatial systems.

Keywords: Density; Entropy; Information; London population; London street system; Spatial complexity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The two-event and three-event systems
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Hierarchical aggregation–decomposition in the three-event system
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Entropy distributions from 1901 to 2001
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Entropy differences from 1901 to 2001
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Spatial aggregation of zones according to a spiral from the two most central to the outer boroughs
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Entropy statistics associated with the spiral aggregation
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Entropy and information differences associated with the spiral aggregation
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
The complete metropolitan region, organized into distance bands
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Left Entropy H and right spatial entropy S
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Left Information I and right Tribus–McIrvine H(p/q)
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
The information difference H maxH and the information difference minus spatial entropy
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
The density of street intersections in Greater London 1786–2010
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
Changes in information and complexity in the population of streets

References

    1. Anderson PW. More is different. Science. 1972;177:393–396. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4047.393. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson PW. More and different: notes from a thoughtful Curmudgeon. Singapore: World Scientific; 2011.
    1. Badii R, Politi A. Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
    1. Batty M. Spatial entropy. Geogr Anal. 1974;6(1):1–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1974.tb01014.x. - DOI
    1. Batty M. Entropy in spatial aggregation. Geogr Anal. 1976;8(1):1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1976.tb00525.x. - DOI