Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 13;9(10):e110247.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110247. eCollection 2014.

Toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles to Escherichia coli: effects of particle size, crystal phase and water chemistry

Affiliations

Toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles to Escherichia coli: effects of particle size, crystal phase and water chemistry

Xiuchun Lin et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Controversial and inconsistent results on the eco-toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) are commonly found in recorded studies and more experimental works are therefore warranted to elucidate the nanotoxicity and its underlying precise mechanisms. Toxicities of five types of TiO2 NPs with different particle sizes (10∼50 nm) and crystal phases were investigated using Escherichia coli as a test organism. The effect of water chemistry on the nanotoxicity was also examined. The antibacterial effects of TiO2 NPs as revealed by dose-effect experiments decreased with increasing particle size and rutile content of the TiO2 NPs. More bacteria could survive at higher solution pH (5.0-10.0) and ionic strength (50-200 mg L(-1) NaCl) as affected by the anatase TiO2 NPs. The TiO2 NPs with anatase crystal structure and smaller particle size produced higher content of intracellular reactive oxygen species and malondialdehyde, in line with their greater antibacterial effect. Transmission electron microscopic observations showed the concentration buildup of the anatase TiO2 NPs especially those with smaller particle sizes on the cell surfaces, leading to membrane damage and internalization. These research results will shed new light on the understanding of ecological effects of TiO2 NPs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. TEM images of the as-received TiO2 NPs.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Changes of zeta potentials of the TiO2 NPs against a solution pH.
Figure 3
Figure 3. EDS (left column) and XRD (right column) figures of the as-received TiO2 NPs.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Variations of the bacteria viability with concentrations of the TiO2 NPs.
The viability was the ratio of bacterial cell number under the NP treatment to the blank control.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Selected TEM images of the unsliced (A to F) and sliced (G to L) E.coli cells without (A and G) and with the treatments of TiO2-NP 10A (B and H), TiO2-NP 25A (C and I), TiO2-NP 25AR (D and J), TO2-NP 50A (E and K) and TiO2-NP 50R (F and L).
The blue arrows point to the cells and the red arrows direct to the NP aggregates.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Relative contents of intracellular ROS (A) and MDA (B) in the bacterial cells after 3 h exposure to the TiO2 NPs (50 mg L−1).
a–e stand for TiO2-NP 10A, TiO2-NP 25A, TiO2-NP 25AR, TiO2-NP 50A, and TiO2-NP 50R, respectively. Asterisk indicates a significant difference relative to the control (*, p<0.05; **, p<0.01) based on the Student’s t test. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3).
Figure 7
Figure 7. The effects of pH (A) and NaCl (B) on the relative viability of E.coli exposed to 10 mg L−1 TiO2-NP 10A for 3 h.
Significant difference (p<0.05) between two treatments is presented by different lowercase letters a, b and c. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3).

References

    1. Chen XB, Mao SS (2007) Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem Rev 107: 2891–2959. - PubMed
    1. Robichaud CO, Uyar AE, Darby MR, Zucker LG, Wiesner MR (2009) Estimates of upper bounds and trends in nano-TiO2 production as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 43: 4227–4233. - PubMed
    1. Kaegi R, Ulrich A, Sinnet B, Vonbank R, Wichser A, et al. (2008) Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 156: 233–239. - PubMed
    1. Lin DH, Tian XL, Wu FC, Xing BS (2010) Fate and transport of engineered nanomaterials in the environment. J Environ Qual 39: 1896–1908. - PubMed
    1. Johnson AC, Bowes MJ, Crossley A, Jarviea HP, Jurkschat K, et al. (2011) An assessment of the fate, behaviour and environmental risk associated with sunscreen TiO2 nanoparticles in UK field scenarios. Sci Total Environ 409: 2503–2510. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources