Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Oct 13:14:761.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-761.

Bevacizumab in first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: German community-based observational cohort study results

Affiliations
Observational Study

Bevacizumab in first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: German community-based observational cohort study results

Ralf Hofheinz et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the efficacy of first-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapy for untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on age.

Methods: Eligibility criteria focused on M1 disease without prior palliative chemotherapy. Choice of chemotherapy regimen was at the physician's discretion. Predefined efficacy endpoints were response rate, progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS). Patients were analysed by age (<70 vs. ≥70 years, <75 vs. ≥75 years).

Results: Of 1777 patients, 27% and 12% were ≥70 and ≥75 years, respectively. PFS was shorter in elderly patients (<70 vs. ≥70 years: 10.5 vs. 9.5 months, p = 0.074; <75 vs. ≥75 years: 10.5 vs. 8.9 months, p = 0.00019), as was OS (<70 vs. ≥70 years: 25.8 vs. 22.7 months, p < 0.0008; <75 vs. ≥75 years: 25.8 vs. 20.8 months; p < 0.0001). In the groups <70 and <75 years, PFS was longer in those receiving oxaliplatin-/irinotecan-containing regimens vs. those receiving 5-FU/capecitabine (<70 years: 10.6 vs. 9.0 months; p = 0.0065; <75 years: 10.6 vs. 9.2 months; p = 0.028); no difference in PFS was observed between oxaliplatin-/irinotecan-containing regimens vs. 5-FU/capecitabine regimens in both elderly age-group comparisons (≥70 years: 9.7 vs. 9.2 months; ≥75 years: 8.3 and 9.0 months).

Conclusion: First-line bevacizumab-based chemotherapies were effective in German mCRC patients ≥75 years of age, but PFS and OS were significantly shorter in this age group vs. younger patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bevacizumab-based therapy administered in cycle 1 according to patient age.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to age. (A) PFS according to Age (<70 and ≥70 years); (B) PFS according to Age (<75 and ≥75 years); (C) OS according to Age (<70 and ≥70 years); (D) OS according to Age (<75 and ≥75 years). OS: overall survival, PFS: progression-free survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to age and chemotherapy regimen. (A) PFS according to age and chemotherapy regimen (<70 and ≥70 years); (B) PFS according to age and chemotherapy regimen (<75 and ≥75 years); (C) OS according to age and chemotherapy regimen (<70 and ≥70 years); (D) OS according to age and chemotherapy regimen (<75 and ≥75 years). FU/CAP: 5-fluorouracil-/capecitabine-based chemotherapy; OS: overall survival, OX/IRI: oxaliplatin-/irinotecan-based chemotherapy, PFS: progression-free survival.

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yancik R. Cancer burden in the aged: an epidemiologic and demographic overview. Cancer. 1997;80:1273–1283. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971001)80:7<1273::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. GLOBOCAN International Agency for Research on Cancer 2008.http://globocan.iarc.fr/
    1. Köhne CH, Folprecht G, Goldberg RM, Mitry E, Rougier P. Chemotherapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Oncologist. 2008;13:390–402. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD, Brouquet A, Cervantes A, On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group Primary colon cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(suppl 5):v70–v77. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq168. - DOI - PubMed
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/761/prepub

Publication types

MeSH terms