Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 14:3:e04046.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.04046.

Early intrinsic hyperexcitability does not contribute to motoneuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Affiliations

Early intrinsic hyperexcitability does not contribute to motoneuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Félix Leroy et al. Elife. .

Abstract

In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) the large motoneurons that innervate the fast-contracting muscle fibers (F-type motoneurons) are vulnerable and degenerate in adulthood. In contrast, the small motoneurons that innervate the slow-contracting fibers (S-type motoneurons) are resistant and do not degenerate. Intrinsic hyperexcitability of F-type motoneurons during early postnatal development has long been hypothesized to contribute to neural degeneration in the adult. Here, we performed a critical test of this hypothesis by recording from identified F- and S-type motoneurons in the superoxide dismutase-1 mutant G93A (mSOD1), a mouse model of ALS at a neonatal age when early pathophysiological changes are observed. Contrary to the standard hypothesis, excitability of F-type motoneurons was unchanged in the mutant mice. Surprisingly, the S-type motoneurons of mSDO1 mice did display intrinsic hyperexcitability (lower rheobase, hyperpolarized spiking threshold). As S-type motoneurons are resistant in ALS, we conclude that early intrinsic hyperexcitability does not contribute to motoneuron degeneration.

Keywords: ALS; hyperexcitability; motoneuron; mouse; neuroscience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Electrical and morphological properties of motoneurons displaying the delayed and the immediate firing patterns.
(A1) WT motoneuron displaying the delayed firing pattern in response to a 5 s pulse. The current intensity was the minimal intensity necessary to elicit firing in our searching protocol (rheobase). Bottom: injected-current (square pulses), middle: voltage-response and top: instantaneous firing frequency. The horizontal dashed line shows the voltage threshold for spiking (−50 mV). (A2) Response of a WT motoneuron displaying the immediate firing pattern. Same arrangement as in A1. (Voltage threshold for spiking: −59 mV). (B1) Single action potentials from a delayed (black line) and an immediate (gray line) firing WT motoneurons elicited by a short square pulse of current. The arrowheads point to the horizontal dotted bar drawn at half action potential amplitudes. (B2) Same records at a longer time base in order to show the after hyperpolarisation (AHP). Dashed lines are the exponential fits of the AHP relaxation. The relaxation time constants are 17 ms and 37 ms for the delayed firing and the immediate firing motoneurons, respectively. Note that the relaxation time constant is longer in the immediate firing motoneuron than in the delayed firing one. C Reconstructed dendritic trees of WT delayed (C1) and immediate (C2) firing motoneurons. The axon was not reconstructed in either case. Reconstructions are projected in the same plane as the slice. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04046.003
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.. In delayed firing motoneurons, the delay depends on the intensity of stimulation.
(AD) Responses of a delayed firing motoneuron to long lasting pulses (5 s) of increasing amplitude. Bottom: injected-current (square pulses in nA). Top: voltage-response (in mV). Note that the delay decreased when the current intensity increased. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04046.004
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. immediate and delayed firing motoneurons both receive VGlut1 inputs and express NeuN.
(A) Vglut1 (red) synaptic inputs are apposed to neurobiotin (green) filled motoneurons (examples of appositions pointed by arrowheads in the inserts that show enlargements of the areas surrounded by rectangles). The bar scale in all insets is 5 μm. (B) NeuN staining (red) of neurobiotin (green) filled motoneurons. The arrowheads point to the cell bodies of the motoneurons that have been intracellularly filled during the electrophysiological experiment. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04046.007
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Immediate firing motoneurons, but not delayed firing motoneurons, express ERRβ.
(A) Examples of Errβ. staining (red) in neurobiotin (green) filled motoneurons. The arrowhead in the first row points to the nucleus (Errβ−positive) of the recorded motoneuron. The asterisk in the second row indicates that the nucleus of the recorded motoneuron was Errβ−negative. (B) Plot of the AHP relaxation time constants against the rheobases for labelled motoneurons. All immediate firing motoneurons were Errβ−positive whereas all delayed firing motoneurons were Errβ−negative. Arrowheads point to the motoneurons illustrated in A. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04046.008
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. The largest delayed firing motoneurons express chondrolectin mRNA contrary to immediate firing motoneurons.
(A) Examples of chondrolectin in situ hybridizations (red) in neurobiotin filled motoneurons (green). The asterisks in the first and third rows indicate that the cell body of the recorded motoneuron was chondrolectin negative. The arrowhead in the second row indicates that chondrolectin is expressed in this delayed firing motoneuron. (B) Plot of the AHP relaxation time constants against the rheobase for the investigated motoneurons. About half of the delayed firing motoneurons (the ones that display the highest rheobase) were chondrolectin-positive. All the immediate firing motoneurons were chondrolectin-negative. Arrowheads point to the motoneurons illustrated in A. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04046.009
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. The largest delayed firing motoneurons express MMP9 contrary to immediate firing motoneurons.
(A) Examples of MMP9 labelling in neurobiotin filled motoneurons (green). The asterisks in the first and third rows indicate the cell body of the recorded motoneurons devoid of MMP9 expression. The arrowhead in the second row indicates that MMP9 was expressed in this delayed firing motoneuron. (B) Plot of the rheobase against the input conductance for the investigated motoneurons. Half of the delayed firing motoneurons (the ones that display the highest rheobases and input conductances) were MMP9-positive. All the immediate firing motoneurons were MMP9-negative. Arrowheads point to the motoneurons illustrated in A. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04046.010
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. mSOD1 immediate firing motoneurons are selectively hyperexcitable.
(A1-2) mSOD1 motoneurons displaying the delayed firing pattern (A1) and the immediate firing pattern (A2). The current intensity was the minimal intensity necessary to elicit firing (rheobase). Bottom: injected-current (square pulses), middle: voltage-response and top: instantaneous firing frequency. The horizontal dashed line shows the voltage threshold for spiking (−37 mV for the delayed firing motoneuron and −48 mV for the immediate firing motoneuron). (B1-2) Plot of rheobase as a function of input conductance for delayed (B1) and immediate (B2) firing motoneurons. In each plot, open squares are for WT motoneurons whereas red dots are for mSOD1 motoneurons. Linear regressions are indicated by dashed lines. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04046.011
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. Absence of mixed mode oscillations in mSOD1 immediate firing motoneurons.
Beginning of the discharge during the injection of slow triangular ramp of current at 0.1 nA/s velocity. See Figure 7—figure supplement 1 for the full traces and F–I curves. Arrowheads point to oscillations between full spikes, the signature of mixed mode oscillations. Note that there is no oscillations between spikes in the mSOD1 immediate firing motoneuron (B2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04046.012
Figure 7—figure supplement 1.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1.. Responses of a delayed firing motoneuron (upper row) and of an immediate firing motoneuron (lower row) to a slow current ramp.
Same motoneurons as in Figure 7. (A1A2) WT delayed firing motoneuron. (A1) Bottom: injected-current (slow triangular ramp at the 0.1 nA/s velocity) and top: voltage-response. (A2) F–I curves for the ascending (black dots) and descending ramps (red squares). Note that the recrutement current occurs at higher intensity than the de-recruitment current. (B1B2) mSOD1 delayed firing motoneuron. In A2 and B2 the dashed horizontal line points to the frequency reached during the ascending phase (black dots) 0.5 s after the motoneuron has started to discharge. These frequencies are 28 Hz for the WT delayed firing motoneuron in A2 and 30 Hz for the mSOD1 delayed firing motoneuron in B2. (C1C2) WT immediate firing motoneuron. The vertical dashed line is the separation between the subprimary range in which MMOs are present and the primary range (PR) in which MMOs are absent during the ascending ramp. The oblique blue dashed line is the linear regression in the primary range. Its slope (29 Hz/nA) is the gain. (D1D2) mSOD1 immediate firing motoneuron. MMOs are absent, there is only a primary range (PR) during the ascending ramp (gain: 41 Hz/nA). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04046.013
Figure 8.
Figure 8.. The dendritic tree of immediate firing motoneurons is shrunk in mSOD1 mice.
(A1-2) Reconstructed dendritic trees of mSOD1 delayed (A1) and immediate (A2) firing motoneurons. The axons were not reconstructed. (B1-2) Plots of total dendritic length as a function of number of branching points for delayed firing motoneurons (B1) and immediate firing motoneurons (B2). In each plot, open squares are for WT motoneurons whereas red dots are for mSOD1 motoneurons. Arrowhead in B1 points at an outlying over-branching mSOD1 delayed motoneuron. Linear regressions are indicated by dashed lines. (C1-2) Distribution of the dendritic paths for delayed (C1) and immediate firing motoneurons (C2). Distributions between WT (open columns) and mSOD1 (red columns) dendritic paths are compared for each firing patterns. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.04046.014

References

    1. Amendola J, Durand J. Morphological differences between wild-type and transgenic superoxide dismutase 1 lumbar motoneurons in postnatal mice. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2008;511:329–341. doi: 10.1002/cne.21818. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaumont E, Gardiner P. Effects of daily spontaneous running on the electrophysiological properties of hindlimb motoneurones in rats. The Journal of Physiology. 2002;540:129–138. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013084. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bories C, Amendola J, Lamotte d'Incamps B, Durand J. Early electrophysiological abnormalities in lumbar motoneurons in a transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The European Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;25:451–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05306.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brownstone RM, Jordan LM, Kriellaars DJ, Noga BR, Shefchyk SJ. On the regulation of repetitive firing in lumbar motoneurones during fictive locomotion in the cat. Experimental Brain Research. 1992;90:441–455. doi: 10.1007/BF00230927. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burke RE. Motor Units: Anatomy, Physiology, and Functional Organization. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society; 1981.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources