Vital places: Facilitators of behavioral and social health mechanisms in low-income neighborhoods

Abstract

Starkly unequal built and social environments among urban neighborhoods are part of the explanation for health disparities in the United States. This study is a qualitative investigation of the ways that residents of a low-income neighborhood in Madison, WI, use and interpret nearby neighborhood places. Specifically, I ask how and why certain places may facilitate beneficial behavioral and social mechanisms that impact health. I develop the organizing concept of "vital places": nearby destinations that are important to and frequently-used by neighborhood residents, and that have theoretical relevance to health. I argue that conceiving of certain places as vital integrates our understanding of the essential components of places that are beneficial to health, while also allowing policy-makers to be creative about the ways they intervene to improve the life chances of residents in disadvantaged neighborhoods. I synthesize the findings into the characteristics of three types of vital places. First, I find that a convenient, comprehensive, and affordable food source can facilitate a healthy diet. An attractive, accessible, and safe recreational facility can support greater physical and social activity. Finally, shared, casual, focused social spaces provide opportunities to create and sustain supportive social ties. This study adds depth and complexity to the ways we conceptualize health-relevant community assets and provides insight into revitalization strategies for distressed low-income housing.

Keywords: Healthy diet; Physical activity; Social support; United States; Vital places.

Figure 1

Conceptual Model: Vital Places and the Relationship of the Neighborhood Structural Environment with Individual Behavioral and Social Mechanisms with Health

Figure 2

Bayview Neighborhood and Surrounding Area, Showing Asian Midway and Nearby Markets, Brittingham Park, and the Neighborhood Courtyards