Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist
- PMID: 25314315
- PMCID: PMC4196729
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744
Critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modelling studies: the CHARMS checklist
Abstract
Carl Moons and colleagues provide a checklist and background explanation for critically appraising and extracting data from systematic reviews of prognostic and diagnostic prediction modelling studies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Reilly BM, Evans AT (2006) Translating clinical research into clinical practice: impact of using prediction rules to make decisions. Ann Intern Med 144: 201–209. - PubMed
-
- Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, Lensing AW, Foster G, et al. (1998) A simple clinical model for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography: potential for an improvement in the diagnostic process. J Intern Med 243: 15–23. - PubMed
-
- Oudega R, Moons KG, Hoes AW (2005) Ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care. A simple diagnostic algorithm including D-dimer testing. Thromb Haemost 94: 200–205. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases