Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2014 Oct;28(9):473-80.
doi: 10.1155/2014/680829.

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology policy on the application for, and implementation of, clinical practice guidelines

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology policy on the application for, and implementation of, clinical practice guidelines

Harminder Singh et al. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

An important mandate of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG), as documented in the Association's governance policies, is to optimize the care of patients with digestive disorders. Clinical practice guidelines are one means of achieving this goal. The benefits of timely, high-quality and evidenced-based recommendations include: Enhancing the professional development of clinical members through education and dissemination of synthesized clinical research; Improving patient care provided by members by providing focus on quality and evidence; Creating legislative environments that favour effective clinical practice; Enhancing the clinical care provided to patients with digestive disease by nongastroenterologists; and Identifying areas that require further information or research to improve clinical care. The present document provides the foundation required to ensure that clinical practice guidelines produced by the CAG are necessary, appropriate, credible and applicable. These recommendations should be adhered to as closely as possible to obtain CAG endorsement.

Comme le démontrent les politiques de gouvernance de l’Association canadienne de gastroentérologie (ACG), l’un des mandats importants de l’association consiste à optimiser les soins aux patients ayant des troubles digestifs. Les directives cliniques font partie des moyens pour réaliser cet objectif. Des recommandations de qualité, opportunes et fondées sur des données probantes comportent les avantages suivants :

  1. Améliorer le perfectionnement professionnel des membres cliniciens par la formation et la diffusion de la synthèse des recherches cliniques.

  2. Améliorer les soins aux patients fournis par les membres en s’attardant sur la qualité et les données probantes.

  3. Créer des environnements législatifs qui favorisent des pratiques cliniques efficaces.

  4. Accroître les soins cliniques des non-gastroentérologues aux patients ayant des troubles digestifs.

  5. Déterminer les secteurs où il faut obtenir plus d’information ou effectuer plus de recherches pour améliorer les soins cliniques.

Le présent document fournit les assises nécessaires pour s’assurer que les directives cliniques produites par l’ACG soient utiles, pertinentes, crédibles et applicables. Il faut adhérer le plus étroitement possible aux recommandations pour obtenir l’aval de l’ACG.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Connor Gorber S, Singh H, Pottie K, Jaramillo A. Process for guideline development by the reconstituted Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. CMAJ. 2012;184:1575–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care Methods Manual. < http://canadiantaskforce.ca/methods/methods-manual/ and GRADE Manual http://canadiantaskforce.ca/methods/grade/> (Accessed June 2014)
    1. Schünemann HJ, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia I, et al. Guidelines 2.0: Systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. CMAJ. 2014;186:E123–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. for the GRADE Working Group Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008;336:995–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types