Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;39(2):303-13; discussion 314.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2774-x.

Mentorship in surgical training: current status and a needs assessment for future mentoring programs in surgery

Affiliations

Mentorship in surgical training: current status and a needs assessment for future mentoring programs in surgery

P Sinclair et al. World J Surg. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Aims: Mentoring has been used extensively in the business world to enhance performance and maximise potential. Despite this, there is currently a paucity of literature describing mentoring for surgical trainees. This study examined the current extent of mentoring and investigated future needs to support this.

Methods: An electronic, 47-item, self-administered questionnaire survey was distributed via national and regional surgical mailing lists and websites through the Association of Surgeons in Training and Specialty Associations in the UK and Republic of Ireland.

Results: Overall, 565 fully completed responses were received from trainees in all specialties, grades and training regions. A total of 48.7 % of respondents reported that they have a surgical mentor, with no significant gender difference (p = 0.65). Of respondents, 52.5 % considered their educational supervisor and 45.5 % their current consultant as mentors. Modal duration of mentoring relationships was 1-2 years (24.4 %). A total of 90.2 % of mentors were in the same specialty, 60.7 % in the same hospital, and 88.7 % in the same training region. Mentors covered clinical and professional matters (99.3 %) versus pastoral and non-clinical matters (41.1 %). Mentoring was commonly face to face or via email and not documented (64.7 %). Of the 51.3 % without a mentor, 89.7 % would like a clinical mentor and 51.0 % a pastoral mentor (p < 0.001). Priority mentoring areas included career progression (94.9 %), research (75.2 %), clinical skills (66.9 %) and clinical confidence (58.4 %). A total of 94.3 % would be willing to act as a peer mentor. Only 8.7 % had received mentoring training; 83 % wish to undertake this.

Conclusions: Less than half of surgical trainees identified a mentor. The majority want mentoring on professional topics during their training and would additionally be willing to peer-mentor colleagues, although few have received training for this. Despite an identified need, there is currently no structure for organising this and little national provision for mentoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Does your mentor have any other professional role for you? b How long has this mentoring relationship existed? c How often do you meet your mentor? d Through what format (s) does this mentoring most commonly take place?
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
How has the mentoring you have received influenced you personally and professionally?
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Ideally, in which areas would you particularly like mentoring?
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
How important to you are the following attributes of your ideal mentor?

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chung DH. Society of University Surgeons mentorship: fostering personal relationships. Surgery. 2012;152(3):304–308. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bulstrode C, Hunt V. What is mentoring? Lancet. 2000;356(9244):1788. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03229-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Underhill CM. The effectiveness of mentoring programs in corporate settings: a meta-analytical review of the literature. J Vocat Behav. 2006;68(2):292–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.05.003. - DOI
    1. Roch GR. Much ado about mentors. Harv Bus Rev. 1979;57(1):14–20. - PubMed
    1. Schapira MM, Kalet A, Schwartz MD, Gerrity MS. Mentorship in general internal medicine: investment in our future. J Gen Int Med. 1992;7(2):248–251. doi: 10.1007/BF02598026. - DOI - PubMed