Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May 15:285:131-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.09.050. Epub 2014 Oct 12.

Neural circuitry for rat recognition memory

Affiliations
Review

Neural circuitry for rat recognition memory

E C Warburton et al. Behav Brain Res. .

Abstract

Information concerning the roles of different brain regions in recognition memory processes is reviewed. The review concentrates on findings from spontaneous recognition memory tasks performed by rats, including memory for single objects, locations, object-location associations and temporal order. Particular emphasis is given to the potential roles of different regions in the circuit of interacting structures involving the perirhinal cortex, hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex and medial dorsal thalamus in recognition memory for the association of objects and places. It is concluded that while all structures in this circuit play roles critical to such memory, these roles can potentially be differentiated and differences in the underlying synaptic and biochemical processes involved in each region are beginning to be uncovered.

Keywords: Hippocampus; Medial prefrontal cortex; Neural circuit; Object recognition memory; Perirhinal cortex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram of the four object recognition memory tasks. (A) Novel object preference task, (B) object location task, (C) object-in-place task, (D) temporal order task.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic diagram of the main pathways underlying object recognition memory that involves multiple items and their contextual associations or the temporal order in which items are encountered.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) Diagram of the temporal order memory task including the timing of the drug infusions. Illustrated is the square arena containing the stimulus objects. In sample phase 1 two identical objects are presented and following an inter-sample interval two different objects are presented in sample phase 2. Following a retention delay, an object from sample phase 1 and an object from sample phase 2 are presented in the test phase. To examine drug effects on encoding, drug infusions were given prior to sample phase 2. To examine effects on retrieval infusions were given prior to the test phase. (B) The effect of AMPA receptor blockade on temporal order memory. Illustrated for each group is the mean (+SEM) discrimination ratio. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, difference between groups. Bilateral infusion of CNQX into the perirhinal cortex (PRH) or medial prefrontal cortex (PL/IL) given before the sample phase 2 or before the test phase. (C) The effect of unilateral drug infusions into the perirhinal cortex (PRH) and medial prefrontal cortex (PL/IL) in opposite hemispheres, prior to sample phase 2 on temporal order memory. Unilateral drug infusions into the PRH, represented by grey shading, disrupts encoding of the object presented in sample phase 2 (S2) so that the S2 object is represented as a novel object. The object information is sent to the un-infused PL/IL. In the opposite hemisphere the un-infused PRH encodes the objects presented in sample phase 1 (S1) and sample phase 2 (S2) as familiar, and may also encode the relative recency of the object presentation, i.e. that the S1 object is an ‘old’ object, while the S2 object has been encountered relatively recently. This object information is sent to the infused PL/IL, but here the order information cannot be expressed correctly as processing has been disrupted by the drug infusion. The bilateral disruption within the temporal order memory circuit results in impaired discrimination.

References

    1. Warburton E.C., Brown M.W. Findings from animals concerning when interactions between perirhinal cortex, hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex are necessary for recognition memory. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48:2262–2272. - PubMed
    1. Dix S.L., Aggleton J.P. Extending the spontaneous preference test of recognition: evidence of object-location and object-context recognition. Behav Brain Res. 1999;99:191–200. - PubMed
    1. Good M.A., Barnes P., Staal V., McGregor A., Honey R.C. Context-but not familiarity-dependent forms of object recognition are impaired following excitotoxic hippocampal lesions in rats. Behav Neurosci. 2007;121:218–223. - PubMed
    1. Winters B.D., Forwood S.E., Cowell R.A., Saksida L.M., Bussey T.J. Double dissociation between hippocampus and perirhinal cortex on tests of spatial and object recognition memory: heterogenity of function within the medial temporal lobe. J Neurosci. 2004;24:5901–5908. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ennaceur A., Neave N., Aggleton J.P. Neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex do not mimic the behavioural effects of fornix transection in the rat. Behav Brain Res. 1996;80:9–25. - PubMed

Publication types