Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Sep;12(3):87-97.
doi: 10.5808/GI.2014.12.3.87. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

Transposable elements and genome size variations in plants

Affiliations
Review

Transposable elements and genome size variations in plants

Sung-Il Lee et al. Genomics Inform. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Although the number of protein-coding genes is not highly variable between plant taxa, the DNA content in their genomes is highly variable, by as much as 2,056-fold from a 1C amount of 0.0648 pg to 132.5 pg. The mean 1C-value in plants is 2.4 pg, and genome size expansion/contraction is lineage-specific in plant taxonomy. Transposable element fractions in plant genomes are also variable, as low as ~3% in small genomes and as high as ~85% in large genomes, indicating that genome size is a linear function of transposable element content. Of the 2 classes of transposable elements, the dynamics of class 1 long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons is a major contributor to the 1C value differences among plants. The activity of LTR retrotransposons is under the control of epigenetic suppressing mechanisms. Also, genome-purging mechanisms have been adopted to counter-balance the genome size amplification. With a wealth of information on whole-genome sequences in plant genomes, it was revealed that several genome-purging mechanisms have been employed, depending on plant taxa. Two genera, Lilium and Fritillaria, are known to have large genomes in angiosperms. There were twice times of concerted genome size evolutions in the family Liliaceae during the divergence of the current genera in Liliaceae. In addition to the LTR retrotransposons, non-LTR retrotransposons and satellite DNAs contributed to the huge genomes in the two genera by possible failure of genome counter-balancing mechanisms.

Keywords: C-value; DNA transposable elements; LTR retrotransposons; genome size; genome-purging.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. Plant DNA C-value Database (release 6.0. December 2012) Surrey: Kew; [Accessed 2014 Jul 18]. Available from: http://data.kew.org/cvalues/
    1. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: targets, trends and tomorrow. Ann Bot. 2011;107:467–590. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michael TP, Jackson S. The first 50 plant genomes. Plant Genome. 2013;6 http://dx.doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2013.03.0001in. - DOI
    1. Doolittle WF, Sapienza C. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature. 1980;284:601–603. - PubMed
    1. Orgel LE, Crick FH. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature. 1980;284:604–607. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources