Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;29(7):1963-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3892-0. Epub 2014 Oct 16.

Safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with pulmonary dysfunction under conscious sedation

Affiliations

Safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with pulmonary dysfunction under conscious sedation

Jun Takada et al. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation is effective for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, its safety is unknown in patients with pulmonary dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the safety of CO2 insufflation during gastric ESD in patients with pulmonary dysfunction under conscious sedation.

Methods: We analyzed 322 consecutive patients undergoing ESD using CO2 insufflation (1.4 L/min) for gastric lesions. Pulmonary dysfunction was defined as a forced expiratory volume in 1.0 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1.0%) <70% or vital capacity <80%. Transcutaneous partial pressure of CO2 (PtcCO2) was recorded before, during, and after ESD.

Results: In total, 127 patients (39%) had pulmonary dysfunction. There were no significant differences in baseline PtcCO2 before ESD, peak PtcCO2 during ESD, and median PtcCO2 after ESD between the pulmonary dysfunction group and normal group. There was a significant correlation between PtcCO2 elevation from baseline and ESD procedure time (r = 0.22, P < 0.05) only in the pulmonary dysfunction group. In patients with FEV1.0% <60%, the correlation was much stronger (r = 0.39, P < 0.05). Neither the complication incidences nor the hospital stay differed between the two groups. CO2 narcosis or gas embolism was not reported in either group.

Conclusions: CO2 insufflation during gastric ESD in patients with pulmonary dysfunction under conscious sedation is safe with regard to complication risk and hospital stay. However, in patients with severe obstructive lung disease, especially in those with FEV1.0% <60%, longer procedure time may induce CO2 retention, thus requiring CO2 monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Can J Anaesth. 1998 Feb;45(2):164-9 - PubMed
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Mar;29(3):365-71 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Nov;144(5):1202-18 - PubMed
    1. Endoscopy. 2010 Dec;42(12):1021-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1959 Aug;78(2):259-65 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources